Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I haven't seen good evidence that Loughner was right wing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:39 PM
Original message
I haven't seen good evidence that Loughner was right wing
I think we need to let the investigation play out before making that conclusion.

Lets send some positive energy/prayer/wishes to Congresswoman Giffords and let the authorities do their job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why wait for facts when speculation is so engaging? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure he was an insane liberal democrat with a 50 year old
progressive hippie driving a VW bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That just happened to show up at a rally hosted by a Democrat hated by the right.
Pure coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. And listed the Communist Manifesto as a favortie book
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 09:49 PM by usregimechange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. yeah, and the totally leftist Mein Kampf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. That is my point, not exactly a clear picture, there is better evidence he was psychotic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. You really did miss Mark Potok's segment didn't you? Read the Intelligence Report by SPLC
It is quite an education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Will do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
55. I agree with you
BUT, I don't think that "psychotic" and "influenced by hateful right wing rhetoric" or mutually exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. For me, the point of the matter is
Whatever his motivation, this underlines the over the top hate speech and actions encouraged by media and the likes of Sarah Palin. Motivation isn't really going to matter to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:43 PM
Original message
Uh, I think you will be proven quite wrong sooner than later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. how ironic
you demand categorical evidence on one hand and then turn around and demand wishful thinking on the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Are you responding to what I said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. and right over your head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. The demand that I didn't make that you pulled out of your ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. what the hell were your contradictory demands doing in my ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. I'd much prefer an 'oh yeah well your momma' comment.
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 10:01 PM by usregimechange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes
I suspect he was right-leaning, but we need to learn more as the investigation proceeds. He may also be mentally ill. Which is sort of the same thing, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, he was probably a peace-loving, liberal, who loved the Democrats.
I mean, that's clear, correct?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. the shooter targeted Giffords at a political rally.
yeah we should wait for the Blue Ribbon Commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. I guess you just missed Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Ctr on KO
He had multiple links based on the suspects writings to some seriously whacked out, far right ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. I suspect that only an Official Statement will suffice.
we've had these arguments here before. The 'no rush to judgement' crowd demands that we wait until we are Told By The Authorities what we should think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. yeah, I'm starting to get that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. He also said: "I don't control your English grammar structure"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Which was addressed by Mark Potok of the SPLC - again, a right wing thing
Please read the Intelligence Report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Link? They don't have anything that recent that I can see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. I think your best bet to read the transcript of Potok's segment when it's up
Mark Potok talked about the rightwing ideologies that these stmts spring from, and he named the leaders and publications.

The grammar weirdness comes from a British rightwing writer so it may not be in the Intelligence Rpt's most recent issues (focused on the USA).

I am a mbr of SPLC and I receive a subscription of the Intelligence Report, so I have read of these people / ideologies before, in depth, unfortunately - its sickening.

One particular article that will acquaint you with the various leaders and their branch of RW thinking is the "Meet The Patriots" article of this summer:

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2010/summer/meet-the-patriots

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
60. link to Potok's video segment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which evidence do you reject?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Hello.
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. 4 whole posts, eh?
Welcome to DU. LOL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. You base that on what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. gee
weren't you here earlier with a different username but the same link and low low post count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Yeah
I think they were, made it to about 15 post then, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. self delete
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 10:08 PM by usregimechange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. Just registered so you could post this, once you've been here
awhile you will learn that you need some proof when posting vague innuendos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. Your link offers no proof whatsoever.
In fact, that poster is posting NOW, so ummm, he's probably not posting from the holding cell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
51. Messenger of what?
You have offered nothing to suggest the shooter was boyblue.

Put up or shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
58. What is the proof this is the same person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. Not possible. He is currently responding to posts, including to
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 09:58 PM by tblue37
one pointing out that he is being accused in the RW blogosphere of being the shooter. If he were the shooter (wh is in custody, you know), he could not be posting responses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. anti-government, worship of a perverted Constitution
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 09:57 PM by Wetzelbill
embraces right-wing radical view of gold and silver. Showed up at a Dem congresswoman's event and shot her. If he isn't an outright RWer, he certainly embraces some of the most paranoid and conspiratorial of views from the right.

edit: made a typo in my original subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. And right now the rightist MSM
is working hard to paint the guy as not being a radical teabagger I'm sure. I can't wait to see how they pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. The attempted assassination of a Democratic politician isn't good enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
45. No it isn't.
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 10:11 PM by usregimechange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
33. Shooting a Democratic Congresswoman in the head isn't enough evidence for you?
Hmmm. Something is funny here.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
39. so what's your pet theory? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
42. I think you're right. I don't think bat-shit fucking nutz has a "wing"
Looking for any coherent political ideal in a totally disordered mind like this is just misguided in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. I agree there are more word salads than political speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
44. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PerpetuallyDazed Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
47. He strikes me as very schizophrenic.
But you have to see K.O. 's interview with the SPLC guy... he made some excellent points, giving names and references to Loughner's youtube videos and his views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
49. He likely is seriously mentally ill. Schizophrenics are almost never ideologues.
They live in an altered reality of their own creating. They simply can't be communists, or RWers, or teabaggers, or any other structured group.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. That is a better theory at this point based on what I have seen so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerpetuallyDazed Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. Read his writings, weird youtube vids...
Maybe they are influenced by his education (look at his reading list), but his "views" and "ideologies" are mostly disjointed and as incoherent as his writing. I'm more interested in finding out more about the second suspect -- white male in his 50's. Teabagger who encouraged the nut job, perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hugo_from_TN Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #49
62. Bingo.
He was all over the map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
53. Regardless you can bet he was influenced by hate radio
Edited on Sat Jan-08-11 10:29 PM by Kingofalldems
and there are no leftists calling for or hinting at violence. Freepers are dreaming up all kinds of scenarios about this guy , I notice. I guess they are desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
54. an eye witness said the shooter asked specifically for the congresswoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
56. On Keith tonight--the guy from the Southern Poverty Law
Center said this guy's ideas were from the radical right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
59. .
Of course you haven't. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
63. Maybe. But it would be more irresponsible to assume that
these events had nothing to do with RW anger, hate, gun-oriented politics, rhetoric, and campaigning by smears and lies. Those who want to look at this in a vacuum....as though Obama hasn't had a record number of death threats, as though gun and ammo sales go through the roof when Obama was elected, as though "second amendment remedies" wasn't uttered and allowed to stand, as though the losing vp candidate didn't target the opposition with gun sights, as though pro-gun citizens didn't show up at rallies wearing guns for the first time in memory....are burying their heads in the sand.

It may be that this one particular incident involves an apolitical lunatic (doubt it). Maybe or maybe not...but that doesn't excuse the heightened right to violence that some people feel they've been given permission to harbor, nor does it excuse the politicians and pundits that play with matches with respect to violence and lunatics.

We should continue to find out about this guy and be accurate wrt his motives...but we should also continue to state the obvious: that continuous emotional talk of violence, of hate for the left, of marxism, of destruction of the country, of evil dem intentions not only could theoretically increase chances of real violence BUT pretty much damn well guarantees that some fringe character will hear the message in his own way and act on it. It MUST BE the obvious question and direction of discussion of this guy.

Never understood why, after calling a doctor 'baby-killer' for months on his show, OReilly was allowed to skate any responsibility or CHANCE of responsibility and stay on the air. I fear, likewise, that just because this guy's mental problems will overshadow the real OR POSSIBLE connection between low road Rovian-Hannity-Levin politics and the hate and violence that follows.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC