|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Pharaoh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:15 PM Original message |
Democrats and the Social Security Messaging Fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Its not that their message fails, its that theres no need for the message in the 1st place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's all very true, but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. To be clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. I haven't heard anyone at the White House talking about SS in relation to the deficit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShockediSay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Democrats fail in messaging period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Very true. They consistently give up the message. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. yep -messenging fails keep happening over and over and over and over and over and over and over and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dhill926 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 08:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. sadly........true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. RW policy is a loser no matter how much "messaging" (lipstick) it gets. Stop advocating RW policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
10. That is because their chosen "message" will be detested by the public and their base. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palmer Eldritch (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
11. the message is that no cuts will be made to SS. Clear enough for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-09-11 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. 2010 social security income... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC