Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If the US defaults, who's going to bail us out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bluesbassman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:47 PM
Original message
If the US defaults, who's going to bail us out?
Ain't gonna be the EU, they're up to their necks in their own problems. China perhaps? I think their books are cooked and they ain't got the reserves.

Any guesses how the default goes down?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Likely social security and medicare would be hit hard, no more payouts.
We'd pay our foreign debts.

I don't think anyone could afford to "bail us out." We already have tons of foreign debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would say Canada because they are good peoples but
Canada is controlled by right wing lunatics as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Canada's economy is a fraction of ours. But theirs would be dragged down, too.
Europe is already in trouble. If we were heading for a depression, we'd drag the rest of the world down with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yep, it'll be global, we're too big and will likely take most with us into a
global depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Actually, for the most part, ....
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 11:13 PM by murphyj87
Canadian Conservatives would be more aligned with Obama on the American political scale, and in a few issues, Canadian Conservatives would be to the left of Obama. In general terms, Canadian Conservatives are nowhere near American Republicans, let alone Americans Conservatives. It is the former Reform Party members of the current Conservative party who are the extremists. The 30% to 40% of current Conservatives who were former Progressive Conservatives, especially those who were Red Tories (more liberal than normal Progressive Conservatives) will tend to keep Harper nearer the middle, when push comes to shove.

The former Reform Party Conservatives are the right wing lunatics, but they are only a small majority (maybe 60%) of the whole Conservative party.

Defense Minister Peter MacKay is former leader of the Progressive Conservatives, and, despite noises Harper made that Canadian fighting troops might stay in Afghanistan, Canadian responsibility there has been handed over to American troops and Canadian fighting troops are on their way home ..... more in line with MacKay's Progressive Conservative leanings than Harper's Reform Party leanings.

I actually think it is possible that Canada will be a positive factor for the US, if the US goes into default, as Republicans want, and even Canadian Conservative policies are nearer the middle of the road in American terms than those of American Republicans, and sometimes, in a handful of ways, the the left of Obama.

My personal opinion is that it would be better for the US to default rather than giving in to Republicans ... again, for about the 5th time with little to show for Obama and Democrats caving in to Republicans all the other times. Clinton tax rates or default is the choice to be made .... no caving.

Of course, that's the opinion of a Canadian NDP'er (for over 40 years), not an American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. As the stock markets fall apart
(because we all know thats DC's sole measure of our economy now)

... Congress will pass an emergency extension of a few days, with both sides waiting for the other to blink first.

If that doesnt soothe the angst on Wall St, the big money players will push to end the madness, hopefully by pressing the GOP to cease playing games and pass an extension like they did 7 times under the Bush administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. We don't need no stinking badges - I mean bailouts...
We just need to cut the military spending. Maybe tone down a war or two or three. Ten years seems like a long time to give away all our money to the military industry. Hey, maybe they can bail us out ;P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesbassman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That's kinda what I'm afraid of.
Seriously though, toning down a war or two would be good in more ways than one. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Unfortunately cutting the military and all wars wouldn't be enough..
You'd have to raise taxes and probably cut some domestic programs too.

It's whose taxes and which programs that the fight is about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. You really think half of this wouldn't be enough?
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 10:14 PM by dbonds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Not gonna happen, not half..
We got an increase this year just voted on and they're all yelling about SS and Medicare cuts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. But you agree that it would be more than enough.
Just tone down the wars. Stop feeding the military industry at the expense of everyday Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Trouble is that spending does stimulate the economy..
Not as much as spending on other things, both by government and by people, but it does stimulate.

That means it's really hard to be sure if that would be a big enough cut because it would cut a lot of medium and large businesses who would immediately lay off people.

All calculations of that sort aside, you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. We have been throwing trillions of dollars down that hole for over 10 years...
And it hasn't 'stimulated' the economy. The economy has gotten worse. What it has done is created a dependence on that industrial sector for jobs, but that money isn't freely flowing out to the rest of the country. Just like all the other huge companies out there, the people at the top are taking all the profits and not putting them back in the economy. And now our country has a financial dependence on war. We need to get rid of that all together. We have way more than it takes to adequately defend ourselves.

I'm thinking about what should be done for the long term growth, even though it might cause a disruption at first. And 'half' is just a random percentage - the percentage should be what ever it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Problem is, they really can't save much on Social Security and Medicare,
If seniors had to suddenly live off their retirement savings, Wall Street would really be in bad shape. That's not going to work.

And seniors who don't have even a small amount in retirement funds would have to go on welfare. It just would not work.

Nursing homes would have to shut down because many of the rely on Social Security for whatever funding Medicaid does not pay.

I once read the amount the average American had saved by retirement. It wasn't much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think Greece is out of the question n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. We'll bail ourselves out with Wall Street taking their cut... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey...what about Armenia? I mean they got a hol....damn, nevermind n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. "...who's going to bail us out?"
....as we go through this depression we should all remember one thing, printing presses are our friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesbassman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Right there. Can't wait to see whose picture they put on the million dollar bill.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. Don't joke. I remember trying to figure out how many zillion
lira I needed to pay for a train ticket somewhere in Italy way back when. (It was about a thousand lira to a dollar at point when we were in Italy.)

We assume that one dollar should buy at least something, but there is no guarantee about that. It could happen that what we buy now for a dollar would cost $10. It's totally arbitrary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesbassman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Well the really scary thought is that the dollar gets devalued, but wages stay the same.
Why would we expect anything else? As we see now, corporations have been reaping windfall profits in the last decade, causing the overall price of goods to rise, yet real wages have not. What would motivate employers to raise compensation to account for the new devalued dollar? They've already demonstrated that the corporate bottom line is the only concern they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. What would motivate employers?
Strikes combined with a movement to impose tariffs or high taxes on imports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
27. time for the amero!
*running*....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. No one. The world catapults into a deeper depression.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-11 10:04 PM by pnwmom
That's the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh we will, wet dream actually of a few places like the IMF
I will let you guess why with these words: IMF Austerity Plan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Goldman Sachs will be johnny-on-the-spot.
Interest free, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. The US can't default unless our politicians choose to do so.
They won't, but even if they did, we wouldn't need a bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. Maybe we will get a new economic consciousness --
like something a little less greedy. You just change the valuation of your currency and all debts are off.

There will probably be a war of currency revaluations. I remember in the 1950s and early 1960s, the French revalued their currency. Suddenly an old Franc was no longer worth a new Franc.
...

In January 1960 the French franc was revalued at 100 existing francs. Old one- and two-franc pieces continued to circulate as centimes (no new centimes were minted for the first two years), 100 of them making a nouveau franc (the abbreviation NF was used on banknotes for some time). Inflation continued to erode the currency's value, but much more slowly than that of some other countries. The one-centime coin never circulated widely. Only one further major devaluation occurred (in August 1969) before the Bretton Woods system was replaced by free-floating exchange rates. Nonetheless, when the Euro replaced the franc on 1 January 1999, the franc was worth less than an eighth of its original 1960 value.

The old franc pieces were gradually withdrawn. They ceased to be legal tender in January 2002, upon the official adoption of the euro.

After revaluation and the introduction of the new franc, many French people continued to speak of old francs (anciens francs), to describe large sums. For example, lottery prizes were often advertised in amounts of centimes, equivalent to the old franc. Multiples of 10NF were occasionally referred to as "mille francs" (thousand francs) or "mille balles" ("balle" being a slang word for franc) in contexts where it was clear that the speaker did not mean 1000 new francs. The expression "heavy franc" (franc lourd) was also commonly used to designate the new franc.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_franc

So, one possibility is really rampant inflation which is why the Republicans want to change the way COLAs are figured. They would reap a double benefit if Social Security benefits are not raised to meet inflation and on top of that you have inflation. That would destroy Social Security.

So don't think for a minute that if a deal is agreed, the Republicans will stop running up deficits whenever they get in power. They hate Social Security and would do anything to ruin this successful government program. It disproves their whole "free markets" "privatization is best" nonsense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC