Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So was Loughner ex-military?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
stranger81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:56 PM
Original message
So was Loughner ex-military?
Seems to have been a pretty good shot with a handgun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. All you gotta say is REPUBLICAN
Goldbug, Palin follower, armed and dangerous....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I heard he applied but they turned him down. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. No. He tried to get into the Army but was rejected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. But he was able to get a handgun......
were going to find out eventually that he was mentally unsuited for the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. And, as it is now being reported, was known to police for making death threats.
No reason whatsoever he shouldn't be armed.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. He reportedly
failed the drug testing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. No. Apparently he applied and was turned down, according to the Pima County sheriff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. not hard to kill with a handgun up close
in a crowd for fucks sake

reports are he tried to join and was rejected a couple years ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Especially with a semi-automatic weapon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stranger81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Even up close, handguns are tricky.
Witness the guy at the city council meeting in Florida a few weeks ago, for instance. Close range, emptied his gun and didn't manage to hit anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. eh
lots of deadly accidents with them

doesn't take any training to shoot up close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. rejected from enlisting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. i understand he flunked the drug test ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stranger81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Interesting. How many people get rejected from the Army these days?
Sounds like they didn't want a Private Pyle on their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Not many.
They will let gang members in these days. I'm pretty sure they're lowering the bar significantly on the test you have to pass to get in. Look at it this way - if the dregs of society can get into the Army but Loughner couldn't, what does that say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. A lot
between being too fat and not smart enough to pass the aptitude test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Quite a few according to one thread posted here at DU
I think it was something like 30-40% fail the military entrance exam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. A LOT
due to failing health/weight requirements and failing basic literacy tests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. The military pretty much lets anyone in...
so if they rejected him, he is worse than nucking futs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. actually, quite a few applicants are rejected
Some reports indicate upwards of one-quarter are rejected for not meeting the physical standards and more than 10 percent fail because of their drug use history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:03 PM
Original message
Am I the only one who finds it worth noting that
a man the military rejected as being unfit can acquire a glock without a moment's problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. You are not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Oops! You're right. I just saw Aquart's post. I'm not the only one!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Actually, that was just my way of saying that I agreed with you.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
likesmountains 52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. Why not?
there are many reasons people are rejected - doesn't automatically mean they are a danger to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
41. The military would find me incredibly unfit to join
The fact that my lungs don't work doesn't mean I'd need to be flagged in the States when it came to firearms purchases, were I the type to want a firearm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rejected. So of course it was legal for him to buy a gun.
We wouldn't let him carry one in the name of our nation, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Beat me to it, and better stated than I was going to post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Being rejected by the military is not the same as being certified insane. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:40 PM
Original message
But we mustn't talk about gun control because it isn't popular.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
33. Sure we can talk about it ...
If the shooter had serious mental issues he should not have been allowed to legally purchase a firearm. We need to improve the existing NICS background check system to better identify such people.


Justice Department Funds Will Improve Brady Background Checks
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 14, 2010

WASHINGTON - September 14 - The U.S. Justice Department’s announcement yesterday of almost $17 million in grants to eight states to improve their Brady background check systems were made possible by legislation passed by Congress in December 2007 and signed by President George W. Bush in January 2008 following the Virginia Tech massacre in April 2007. A number of families affected by those shootings personally urged enactment of this law, along with the Brady Campaign.

Although a Virginia court had found him to be dangerously mentally ill, the Virginia Tech shooter passed two Brady background checks because Virginia had not submitted the appropriate record to the FBI’s National Instant Check System (NICS).

Seven of the eight states (Idaho, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Texas, and Wisconsin) that were announced as grant recipients yesterday had submitted very few records of mental health adjudications to the NICS at least through November of 2008, according to an update the Justice Department released to the Brady Campaign in January 2009. Only Florida, which receives a $3,159,228 grant, had submitted a significant number of those records since 2001. The other seven states receiving grants had submitted fewer than 40 records combined as of November 2008.

“We commend the Justice Department for getting critical funds to these states to improve their Brady background record submissions. States overall have done a very poor job of submitting records of dangerously mentally ill persons who shouldn’t be allowed to purchase firearms,” said Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign. “As a result, dangerous people who shouldn’t pass Brady background checks to purchase guns are passing those checks and getting armed.”
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2010/09/14-10


This subject was discussed in the Gungeon:
http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x339670




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. Many are rejected for simply being overweight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. He's not overweight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. FYI. Most soldiers in the army don't fire handguns.
Even if he had been in the army, he probably wouldn't have learned to shoot there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. FOX (forgive me) reported that the Army says he tried to enlist but was rejected.
I'm sorta hooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. Are you ex-military?
Just kidding, lol.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. No, the army rejected him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuclearDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
35. You don't really have to be military to be a decent shot with a semi-auto handgun...
Especially when you're firing an extended clip into a crowd and only managing to hit barely over hit with 50% of your rounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
42. In 8 years in the Marine Corps I think I fired a pistol twice
You have to have a job that uses a pistol to get training in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC