Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ Publisher @ Center of Phone Hack Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 08:48 AM
Original message
WSJ Publisher @ Center of Phone Hack Scandal
WSJ Publisher @ Center of Phone Hack Scandal

by LieparDestin
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/10/993103/-WSJ-Publisher-@-Center-of-Phone-Hack-Scandal?via=siderec

.................................

But attention is now turning to Hinton, 67, who headed up News International during Brooks’s and Coulson’s editorships and now runs the New York-based Dow Jones & Co., another arm of Murdoch’s sprawling News Corp. Murdoch’s long-time lieutenant, some News Corp watchers say, could end up being a high-profile casualty in the scandal.

“The person that I think is most of a problem for Murdoch is Les Hinton,” Peter Burden, author of a 2008 book about the News of the World, told Reuters.

"He was definitely around when it was going on and he's now running the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones, and for him to be seen to be mixed up in that whole tacky situation would be very, very damaging indeed."

..

For the last six months, I have heard that Mr Hinton has not been visiting the UK for precisely that reason, in order to avoid drawing any attention to himself,” Enders told Reuters

MORE:
http://news.yahoo.com/could-murdoch-deputy-hinton-fall-234333441.html


..................................


There is speculation in the Murdoch empire that senior executives could face criminal charges in the US and the UK. Legal experts say that Les Hinton, the publisher of the WSJ, and James Murdoch could potentially face charges under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) or the UK's Regulation of Investigative Practices Act (RIPA). The US law means executives can be held to account for bribes paid by overseas subsidiaries, while the RIPA makes company officials liable regardless of their direct role in unlawful practices. "Under RIPA, ignorance of what was going on is not a defence," said a legal source.

more:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/the-battle-of-wapping-mk-ii-2310041.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh sweet Jesus, what a heavenly thought that some principal purveyors of societal evil in America
might have gotten their short hairs caught in a big wringer. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC