Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have NEVER used pot and doubt I ever will but why in the hell does Obama....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:21 PM
Original message
I have NEVER used pot and doubt I ever will but why in the hell does Obama....
think arresting pot users and growers ranks in the top 1000 of things he needs to have the justice department spend time on?

Isn't there enough wrong with this country that we can leave that to the states to deal with?

Unbelievable!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dunno. Maybe he's tough on pot to diffuse his former drug use
That makes as much sense to me as anything else does, in explanation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're big on betrayal, this administration
I guess this is just part of that agenda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Or their favorite sport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. You should try pot.
I gave it up cause I had trouble gettin out of bed but that is me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmyflint Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know. I always thought going after pot
was a total waste of money and time. Maybe President Obama owes a favor to the correction officer unions or private prison industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Obama owes to the Unions?
:rofl: No, his bosses are much MUCH richer. Try big pharma. He's mainly cozying up to the the "independents" (nod nod, wink wink) and the conservanazis, you know, his REAL constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmyflint Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. That makes more sense.
I knew there was money and some benefit for somebody. I heard beer companies pay alot to keep pot illegal also, but I don't know if it's true or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. It makes no sense at all.
He is losing votes over it though. This is a big issue for some people around here.

Nobody can figure out why he's being such a right wing nut case on this issue.

Pot isn't the dangerous political 3rd rail it used to be. Everyone knows damn well that there is legitimate medicinal value. The DEA are acting like completely uninformed morons with their ancient reefer madness bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. "there is legitimate medicinal value"
That's it. There's your reason. The pharmaceutical companies don't want people to have a cheap alternative to their overpriced drugs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. i'll also never use pot but think it should be legal and regulated; however,
i also recognize that, for now at least this is a complete loser issue in terms of presidential politics.
whatever political capital obama has, he'd be a fool to spend it on this.

his admission to trying cocaine once upon a time was interestingly a virtual non-issue during his election campaign (a clear indication that he had the media / powers-that-be stamp of approval, if you ask me), but if he tries to legalize any currently illegal drugs, they'll paint him as an incorrigible druggie.

he'd lose the issue and he'd render himself politically irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. it's interesting that "political capital" is only viewed as accruing to conservatives
Edited on Sun Jul-10-11 10:31 PM by RainDog
when 70% of Americans favor medical marijuana legalization.

just who would be offended? the 30% who supported Bush till the dirty end?

honestly, Obama needs to spend some political capital on the democratic base, you know, like the republicans do with their base.

let reason and common sense win one for a change.

not to mention that it makes everyone in the federal govt in any way connected to this issue to look like total #@$^%&*%#s to have so little compassion for people who can benefit from this substance - because of their own freaking personal political gain.

that sort of makes me want to vomit, in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Then he can just ignore it! n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. it doesn't work that way. if isn't seen as strong against drugs,
then he's seen as condoning them, effectively decriminalizing them.

only because we've got some warped attitudes towards, among other things, drugs, in this country, but that's the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I don't think too many people expected Obama to push for the decriminalization of pot..
Edited on Mon Jul-11-11 06:36 AM by Upton
but I, for one, did expect him to keep his promises on medical marijuana...something he hasn't done. In fact, he has actually ramped up the war against patients and dispensaries. There's just no excuse..

"I'm not going to be using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue."

http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080323/NEWS/803230336

"I would not have the Justice Department prosecuting and raiding medical marijuana users. It's not a good use of our resources."

http://granitestaters.com/candidates/barack_obama.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. Must be a great reason to stay in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.
Otherwise, he'd be seen as soft on terror, or something. What horseshit. Any stand he took for MMJ would be as much of an issue as he wanted to make it. Christ, he's leaving gay marriage up to the states, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Uhhhh, he could simply keep his campaign promise.
That he'd dial back the busting of MM dispensaries instead of escalating them like he has. This issue will cost him, but not like you think it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because TPTB need the prison slave labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hmm. Reminds me of CHINA. YIKES. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. High incarceration rate helps to keep unemployment figures lower
than they would be otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Bingo. I think this is reason #1. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. This is the winning answer. There are more & more stories about corporations using prison labor,
paying incredibly cheap wages & in one case, no wages. One state (WI, MI? Can't remember.) the prisoners don't get paid, but get time off their sentences. What a great deal for the corporations. I believe this is why prez O has backed off his campaign promises about MMJ. It's just another part of the plan to decrease wages in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because it's easy busy-work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. just easy low-hanging fruit to appease the right.
surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. He is trying to appeal to the Republicans.
For some unknown reason. And not only on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Republican voters aren't exactly obssesed with this either and those that are probably
Edited on Mon Jul-11-11 07:41 AM by TheKentuckian
way to far gone to be courting and can't be very significant in real numbers.

I think the state has made pot an acceptable end around the fourth amendment and they can't effectively maintain the kind of police state they want without it, the potential to cut into Pharma profits are too high, the private prison complex and our court systems are addicted, police cannot justify their headcounts without it, and if bud just keeps hanging around eventually there will be a hemp movement that would be a huge danger to many established industries including even big oil.

Obama's job is to protect the establishment and doing the right thing will usually come at cross purposes with the job's prime directive.
The wall is starting to come down and the Feds are flexing a bit here to intimidate efforts to change direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Your explanation is better than mine.
I was just shooting my mouth off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
21. Going after pot growers and smokers will certainly keep them busy
Edited on Mon Jul-11-11 07:39 AM by lunatica
No doubt about that.

It's a never ending domestic war they can keep throwing lots of money at. I'm sure the poor and destitute will be glad to give up their social nets for the good cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. Afraid of going after the real criminals
Plus, hypocrisy seems to excite the President on a basic level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. Because the war on drugs is a massive money maker
and pot is probably the largest of the illegal drugs out there that is used.

if you cut out the biggest money maker, how are you supposed to grease your friends?

See how it works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. Perhaps because investigating and prosecuting torture promoting, war criminals is hard work.
It's not so difficult to go after the "little people;" seeking relief from their ailments or just a means for relaxation.

Thanks for the thread, Logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. You say truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
33. or... persecuting John Edwards. not nearly on the same level of importance, but equally absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC