|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:13 PM Original message |
Don't be surprised if we eventually find out ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. And vice versa. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. It just seems hard to imagine that a paper the size of News of the World would have had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Of course he was in cahoots. Doesn't Murdock have something to do with Fox and other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Murdoch and the Saudis (R) own Fox Propaganda (R) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Because Republicans have no country. They're sociopaths, authoritarians, they pretend patriotism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm sure all that "warrantless wiretapping" was for a reason...and it clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Murdock scratched their back many a time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 03:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Murdoch was a fairly strong supporter of Hilary Clinton in her 2006 election... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. Based on what logic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I'm betting you're wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. The wiretapping included politicians and the Royals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 08:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Then you're really not looking very hard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
8. To quote the Hangover: "Quid pro quo, douchebags." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
9. Please ,please, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
13. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
15. if true, then prosecution is probably off the table |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
16. GOP/FOX are tight enough, alright |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-11-11 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
17. I am convinced Murdoch helped Bush hack Kerry's commuinication |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
19. The Patriot Act came in handy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC