Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The House .. voted for a $.. bill that increases the Defense .. budget by $17 billion ..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:36 PM
Original message
"The House .. voted for a $.. bill that increases the Defense .. budget by $17 billion ..."
House Votes on Increasing Defense Budget
Written by Aquala Bogan Defense & National Security Jul 11, 2011

The House of Representatives recently voted for a $649 billion defense spending bill that increases the Defense Department’s budget by $17 billion. Even amid the sluggish economy and cuts being made to various government agencies, the House made it clear where its priorities lie, one GOP representative said.

“House Republicans demonstrated responsible leadership that sets priorities and does not jeopardize our national security interests and our nation’s ongoing military efforts,” Rep. Tom Price, (R-Ga.), chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee, said in a statement.

The bill would cover $119 billion in costs to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and give $530 billion to the Pentagon. The bill was voted for and debated on in a bipartisan manner. Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank and Tea Party freshman Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) took issue with the bill.

“The military budget is not on the table,” Frank told MSNBC.com. “The military is at the table, and it is eating everybody else’s lunch.” Mulvaney also said constituents expect more fiscal responsibility from their representatives. “How can we look them in the eye and tell them that we are serious about cutting spending and then come in and plus up the base defense budget?” he asked ...

http://www.executivegov.com/2011/07/house-votes-on-increasing-defense-budget/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. What on earth??? They're going to cut essential programs but increase the unessential? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimmyflint Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, thank goodness we didn't spend that 649 billon here.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. "House Republicans demonstrated responsible leadership"
Fuck that noise; they did NOT.

This is irresponsible in the extreme.

:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. killing machines are irresponsible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-11 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, they set priorities all right.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, my Congressman, Graves, was on MSNBC tonight with
Al Sharpton, bragging about how he disagrees with any spending, bla, bla, bla. Just after I watched him, I got an email about him voting FOR this Defence increase! First thing I did was send him an email calling him out on his BS lies! I used to be very formal and polite with my comments to these AH's, but no moe! I'm damn sick of it and I call them out, very plainly (but without vulgarity) every time!

Of course, I doubt anyone pays any attention to what I saybecause I live in the Red State of Georgia, and if he gets any other emails, they probably pat him on the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Passed overwhelmingly. 336 to 87, god damn it.
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 12:11 AM by chill_wind
"The strong bipartisan vote was 336 to 87 and reflected lawmakers’ intent to ensure national security, preserve defense jobs across the nation, and avoid deep cuts while the country is at war.

While House Republican leaders slashed billions from all other government agencies, the Defense Department is the only one that will see a double-digit increase in its budget beginning Oct. 1."

http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-09/news/29756144_1_chaplains-pentagon-budget-defense-spending


Still, Obama had wanted even more:

"The House cut about $8 billion from Obama's overall defense spending request, voting to provide about $530 billion for the Pentagon's primary budget and another $119 billion for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq."

Pentagon primary budget is *$18 billion more than 2011*(Reuters)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/08/usa-budget-defense-idUSN1E7670UA20110708

(extra emphasis mine).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. 2/3 of that is waste and needs to be cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. ..if only we could find a way to cut all this wasteful spending. (sarcasm intended) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC