Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Overkill from the environmental perfection folks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:40 PM
Original message
Overkill from the environmental perfection folks
Environmental perfection will be the death of the Middle Class.

If you doubt that, take a look at your city utility bill. A large chunk of what you’re paying for sewer and water is the direct result of state and federal overkill with environmental regulations.

Manteca’s treated wastewater for years exceeded state quality standards. The water the city returned to the San Joaquin River was - and still is - substantially cleaner than what floats by on any given day. The city hired a chemist over 10 years ago to prove it.

But the state wasn’t interested. They had switched test fish for ammonia content in treated wastewater from a native species found in the Delta to minnow fingerlings that are super sensitive to ammonia. The result is Manteca - and a host of other nearby cities - failed the tests. The result was at least a $20 million tab to upgrade the wastewater treatment plant or about a third of the bill for the retrofit and expansion project.

Cont'd at the link: http://www.mantecabulletin.com/section/38/article/25403/

Fuck this writer. Our goal should be to eliminate all poisons out of our water. Standards should increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. No shit standards should increase.
What kind of mindless dumbfuck fool thinks that water is too clean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually, it can be
Not with respect to ammonia of course. The standards should become more strict over time. But you don't really want to be dumping "distilled" water or any equivalent into a river. River water has all manners of nutrients in them and you want them to be there, along with appropriate levels of oxygen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. True, but with our science there has to be a way to put back the nutrients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. It could be
but generally sewage effluent does not suffer a problem with being too clean.

Every source of nutrients, even dilute nutrients, contributes to the total daily maximum load. Naturally, rivers do not have treated sewage effluent flowing into them. The fact that a waterbody is already eutrophied by cultural non-point sources should not be used as an excuse to contribute to the problem, even at low levels. That said, there are reasonable and practicable standards. Thermodynamics makes removing concentrated pollutants relatively inexpensive, but very dilute pollutants are at a high entropy state and thus expensive to remove. The challenge grows as the entropy factor in the equation becomes quite large and therefore removal requires vastly more energy input.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is a point of diminishing returns...
...should the water from a waste water treatment plant come out as clean as tap water?
I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why not?
Too expensive?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. maybe not like tap water, but as clean as the
water at the intake valve before treatment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly...
...what would be the point of cleaning it cleaner than the body of water
that you are discharging it into?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ammonia
Is there ammonia in the feed water? Chlorine? Toilet Turds? Drugs?

Clean up your crap, is what the laws says.
If those up stream of you are dumping, then get them to stop, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hmm. If only sewage could be used for something practical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Politicians seem to fling it pretty good n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. It is, but only inside the Beltway
Republicans are so full of shit they have to be getting it from somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC