Oops! Supreme court bans use of secret evidence to hide torture claims

[malaise]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/jul/13/supreme-court-secret-evidence-ban
<snip>
The supreme court has outlawed the use of secret evidence in court by the intelligence services to conceal allegations that detainees were tortured.

The decision will be seen as a significant victory for open justice, but the panel of nine judges pointed out that parliament could change the law to permit such "closed material procedures" in future.

The appeal was brought by lawyers for MI5 seeking to overturn an earlier appeal court ruling that prevented the service from suppressing accusations British suspects had been ill-treated at Guantánamo Bay and other foreign holding centres.

The case arose originally out of claims by Bisher al-Rawi, Binyam Mohamed, Jamil el-Banna, Richard Belmar, Omar Deghayes and Martin Mubanga that MI5 and MI6 aided and abetted their unlawful imprisonment and extraordinary rendition.
--------------
This is great news.
How many laws did Blair violate in Britain?

[ElboRuum]

1. Please preface title with UK in the future.

I mistakenly thought that the US Supreme Court had finally delivered an opinion which didn't uphold the government's right to do whatever the fuck it wants and fuck me for asking the question.

I feel like I've been rickrolled.

[mopinko]

2. +1

;-)

[malaise]

3. LOL

You know better than that :evilgrin:

[ellenfl]

4. me, too. eom