Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HRW Calls For Criminal Investigation re Bush Officials. Obama has legal obligation to investigate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:22 AM
Original message
HRW Calls For Criminal Investigation re Bush Officials. Obama has legal obligation to investigate.
The latest report is based on recently released documents that strengthen the case against Bush and others. HRW calls on foreign nations to act if the Obama Administration continues to shield them from investigation and prosecution.

http://www.rferl.org/content/hrw_wants_investigation_of_bush/24263852.html

July 13, 2011
By Heather Maher

<edit>.

In a new report, Human Rights Watch cites "overwhelming evidence" that Bush ordered the use of torture -- including waterboarding and secret rendition -- to be used on terrorism suspects from the earliest days after the terror attacks of 2001.

<edit>

Titled "Getting Away With Torture: The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees," the report also contains what the group says is evidence of illegal acts sanctioned by Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and CIA Director George Tenet.

<edit>

The rights group says President Barack Obama has a legal duty to investigate acts of torture and other ill-treatment of detainees because the United States -- along with more than 140 other countries -- is a signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture.

In a statement, the group's director, Kenneth Roth, said the United States "is right to call for justice when serious international crimes are committed in places like Darfur, Libya, and Sri Lanka, but there should be no double standards." He added, "When the U.S. government shields its own officials from investigation and prosecution, it makes it easier for others to dismiss global efforts to bring violators of serious crimes to justice."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. This morning, Jeremy Scahill is on Amy's show. He's been to Somalia
and is reporting on Obama's secret CIA prison in Mogadishu. I guess it would be difficult to prosecute rendition and torture if you are involved in it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Certainly makes it hard to follow through on the oath of office.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. But Bush's lawyers said it was okay
And under the Obama Doctrine (which I have subtitled "Close Enough"), that's all that's needed to lay a patina of legality on whatever the fuck someone wants to do. As soon as Rupert Murdoch has one of his pettifogging shysters come out to put a "legal" imprimatur on his corporate shenanigans, the Obama Justice Department will close down any investigations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Perhaps Newscorpse has influenced actions or inactions in this sphere as well?
Who can say how many people they hold by the short hairs?:shrug:

Thanks for the thread, Karmadillo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, but like all indictable criminal acts, that is in the past.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC