mfcorey1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 08:58 AM
Original message |
This was a political shooting. A deranged person would have just shot anybody at random. He aimed |
|
at and shot a duly elected member of the United States Congress. The talking heads can spin all they want to but the facts are the facts. Mentally unstable would have just chosen the people in the store. It is time to cut the crap or this kind of thing will continue.
|
peacebird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message |
1. repubs have learned well that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes accepted as truth |
|
They used it with weapons of mass destruction, mushroom clouds, health care death panels....
Why would they drop their winning strategy in favor of honesty?
|
Lucinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message |
2. True...by all accounts she was a deliberate target. He also shot a young girl |
|
I don't see anything political in that. I see mental instability in that.
|
CanonRay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
a true deranged person would have shot up the Safeway, or the parking lot.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message |
4. No they can't - officials have stated that Gabby GIffords was |
|
the target. That is a fact they cannot deny.
|
northernlights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message |
|
a mentally ill person doesn't shoot at random. They shoot at their delusion.
In this case, it may well have been a politically-motivated delusion.
It's not either/or. Suggestion: don't fight ignorance with more ignorance.
|
mfcorey1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Chill. I stand by my statement. Measure ignorance another way. nt |
upi402
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Because he was ill doesn't absolve the RW inciters to violence |
|
Beck, Palin, Hannity, Savage, Sharon Angel, Bill-o, Rush... there are so many. This guy's lack of stability does not mean these haters are not culpable. They are fully aware of what they are doing.
|
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. The fact that he apologized on the internet before doing it shows |
|
premeditation - this is not going down as "insanity".
|
Strelnikov_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. Could you PM me a link to the study of the mentally ill's target choices? |
|
There are so many mentally ill shootists that their target images have been studied and found to be their delusions?
I don't believe that that's true.
For all you good intent, you've over-generalized and too broadly extrapolated.
|
Strelnikov_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Appears he was unstable. Most assassins through history could be considered 'unstable' |
|
Point is, with the discourse pushed by the Republican Party, demonize and divide, it is lighting a match under individuals like the shooter.
With everything Republican, if they spin one way, the truth is in other direction.
|
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message |
10. mentally Unstable people can not be angry at an individual? Not true |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-09-11 09:14 AM by stray cat
The congresswoman was unable to answer his question at a meeting
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
18. You think he just had the gun, and got mad because his question |
|
went unanswered? You a digging an incredible hole for yourself.
|
pacalo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Oh my. Yes, a deranged person could single out someone as a target. |
pintobean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |
90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
I wonder if it will soon be discovered somewhere, that, like Hinkley, the Loughner family has a long standing relationship with the Bush family?
Just wondering. Pure left wing liberal delusional and unfounded speculation.
-90% Jimmy
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
16. it's clear you know nothing whatsoever about mental illness. Nothing at all. |
ProgressiveProfessor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Not necessarily true. Many mentally unstable people still function in society |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-09-11 10:41 AM by ProgressiveProfessor
while having some really warped ideas. My take at this point is that he seems more crackers than political.
Giffords was a SW Democrat. Pro gun, pro military, pro 1070, voted against Pelosi for Minority leader, but supported the President on health care reform, and was pro choice. If it was truly political, I could think of many others who would be targeted first.
For now I am waiting to see what comes and hope for the best for the wounded.
|
justiceischeap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. She also supports gay-rights and is Jewish |
|
If the reports that he was associated with American Renaissance, an anti-semite group, are true, then that too could be motivation.
|
ProgressiveProfessor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
25. Even so, it would seem there were more left wing targets out there |
|
Its one of the reasons I am tending to the crackers theory.
|
Erose999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message |
20. He did shoot at other people though, right? Including a (R) Judge and a little girl. |
|
I read one report that said something like 18 people were shot.
|
ProgressiveProfessor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
24. I was somewhat surprised he did not take his own life |
|
But crackers is as crackers does
|
justiceischeap
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
27. Maybe he planned on suicide by cop but was stopped before they got there (eom) |
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Yes, definitely political |
|
By someone who took his politics and himself far, far too seriously.
|
fascisthunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |
22. he was coached by right wingo media |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
mopinko
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
26. i don't think there is any evidence out there to support |
|
your conjecture. if you can find any, please put up a link.
|
unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-09-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message |
28. random shootings are rare. you usuallyneed to be both violently crazy/psychopathic AND have a target |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-09-11 11:06 AM by unblock
the key is that responsible public figures should have the ethics and decency not to feed those delusions and anger or to paint targets on peoples' heads.
i'm still royally pissed at bernie shaw for asking the "what if kitty dukakis were raped" question. some people criticized it for the politics of it, how nasty it was to *michael* dukakis, but my problem with it was that it was horrendously irresponsible to plant that suggestion on live t.v.
fortunately, no harm ever came to kitty, but if she WERE raped after that but some crazy, we'd know who to blame.
there are some things that you just don't say on the air, and talking about hypothetical violent acts against named individuals is most definitely one of them.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message |