Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This was a political shooting. A deranged person would have just shot anybody at random. He aimed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
mfcorey1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 08:58 AM
Original message
This was a political shooting. A deranged person would have just shot anybody at random. He aimed
at and shot a duly elected member of the United States Congress. The talking heads can spin all they want to but the facts are the facts. Mentally unstable would have just chosen the people in the store. It is time to cut the crap or this kind of thing will continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. repubs have learned well that if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes accepted as truth
They used it with weapons of mass destruction, mushroom clouds, health care death panels....

Why would they drop their winning strategy in favor of honesty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. True...by all accounts she was a deliberate target. He also shot a young girl
I don't see anything political in that. I see mental instability in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Spot on
a true deranged person would have shot up the Safeway, or the parking lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. No they can't - officials have stated that Gabby GIffords was
the target. That is a fact they cannot deny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. bullshit.
a mentally ill person doesn't shoot at random. They shoot at their delusion.

In this case, it may well have been a politically-motivated delusion.

It's not either/or. Suggestion: don't fight ignorance with more ignorance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mfcorey1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Chill. I stand by my statement. Measure ignorance another way. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Because he was ill doesn't absolve the RW inciters to violence
Beck, Palin, Hannity, Savage, Sharon Angel, Bill-o, Rush... there are so many. This guy's lack of stability does not mean these haters are not culpable. They are fully aware of what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The fact that he apologized on the internet before doing it shows
premeditation - this is not going down as "insanity".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yep n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Could you PM me a link to the study of the mentally ill's target choices?
There are so many mentally ill shootists that their target images have been studied and found to be their delusions?

I don't believe that that's true.

For all you good intent, you've over-generalized and too broadly extrapolated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Appears he was unstable. Most assassins through history could be considered 'unstable'

Point is, with the discourse pushed by the Republican Party, demonize and divide, it is lighting a match under individuals like the shooter.

With everything Republican, if they spin one way, the truth is in other direction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. mentally Unstable people can not be angry at an individual? Not true
Edited on Sun Jan-09-11 09:14 AM by stray cat
The congresswoman was unable to answer his question at a meeting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. You think he just had the gun, and got mad because his question
went unanswered? You a digging an incredible hole for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Oh my. Yes, a deranged person could single out someone as a target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hinckley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Speaking of Hinkley
I wonder if it will soon be discovered somewhere, that, like Hinkley, the Loughner family has a long standing relationship with the Bush family?

Just wondering. Pure left wing liberal delusional and unfounded speculation.

-90% Jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. it's clear you know nothing whatsoever about mental illness. Nothing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. Not necessarily true. Many mentally unstable people still function in society
Edited on Sun Jan-09-11 10:41 AM by ProgressiveProfessor
while having some really warped ideas. My take at this point is that he seems more crackers than political.

Giffords was a SW Democrat. Pro gun, pro military, pro 1070, voted against Pelosi for Minority leader, but supported the President on health care reform, and was pro choice. If it was truly political, I could think of many others who would be targeted first.

For now I am waiting to see what comes and hope for the best for the wounded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. She also supports gay-rights and is Jewish
If the reports that he was associated with American Renaissance, an anti-semite group, are true, then that too could be motivation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Even so, it would seem there were more left wing targets out there
Its one of the reasons I am tending to the crackers theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. He did shoot at other people though, right? Including a (R) Judge and a little girl.

I read one report that said something like 18 people were shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. I was somewhat surprised he did not take his own life
But crackers is as crackers does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Maybe he planned on suicide by cop but was stopped before they got there (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yes, definitely political
By someone who took his politics and himself far, far too seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. he was coached by right wingo media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
26. i don't think there is any evidence out there to support
your conjecture. if you can find any, please put up a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
28. random shootings are rare. you usuallyneed to be both violently crazy/psychopathic AND have a target
Edited on Sun Jan-09-11 11:06 AM by unblock
the key is that responsible public figures should have the ethics and decency not to feed those delusions and anger or to paint targets on peoples' heads.


i'm still royally pissed at bernie shaw for asking the "what if kitty dukakis were raped" question. some people criticized it for the politics of it, how nasty it was to *michael* dukakis, but my problem with it was that it was horrendously irresponsible to plant that suggestion on live t.v.

fortunately, no harm ever came to kitty, but if she WERE raped after that but some crazy, we'd know who to blame.

there are some things that you just don't say on the air, and talking about hypothetical violent acts against named individuals is most definitely one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC