Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Announcement! Social Security And Medicare ARE NOT ENTITLEMENTS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:13 AM
Original message
Announcement! Social Security And Medicare ARE NOT ENTITLEMENTS!
We all have paid good money into these retirement plans and to have them being called Entitlements, as if they are welfare programs is a fucking lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um...you should check the definition of "entitlement"
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 10:19 AM by CleanGreenFuture
en·ti·tle·ment/enˈtītlmənt - Noun
1. The fact of having a right to something.
2. The amount to which a person has a right

You actually SAID THAT yourself: '

"We all have paid good money into these retirement plans..."

That is the definition of an "entitlement"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Um, ...they're actually called "transfer programs." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. So? What does that have to do with the definition of "entitlement"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wrong.
Because we paid into them, they ARE "entitlements".

As in we are entitled to receive them because they are OURS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Entitlement is not a dirty word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. They should be basic functions that are independent of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, they are Entitlements. Just like, as American cititzens, we're entitled to various Rights as
delineated in the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. see, the pukes have fucked up the language. Entitlement=bad word in their book
the same as

Liberal, Social Justice, and others are now cursed words. We are entitled to medicare and social security because they are ours, and that's not a bad thing.


Frank Luntz fucked us up. Millionaires are now "job creators" and letting a tax cut expire is now a "tax hike"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am wrong, they are Entitlements but Like the word Liberal, Entitlement has become a dirty word.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 10:27 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
This makes stealing from us as fair game....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Running away from the word won't help, as with "liberal"...
...you'll just be accused of not admitting you were wrong.

Better to throw it back at them and point out the switcheroo: they spent years railing against how much of the Federal budget was devoted to entitlements, and implied it all went to welfare programs when most of it was SS and Medicare. Now that "welfare as we knew it" is gone, they're reversing their terminology trick to imply that SS and Medicare are "welfare".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. entitlement is the right word...
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 10:27 AM by veganlush
..we paid in, we're entitled to the benefit, it's just that they changed the meaning of words by constantly saying them to their simple followers in a negative way. The words communism and socialism are perfect examples. The words "commune" and "community" are rooted in the same word. In a commune, equal work gets equal spoils. In a community, taypayers pitch-in for equal services, like firefighters, police, garbage collection, etc...ask your favorite right-winger which socialist programs he would keep if it was up to him. Would he keep the military, the police, the firefighters, the library....? they need to be told what socialism is so they can stop railing against it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. You mean we're NOT "entitled" to them? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. Actually they are
but the words seems to been twisted to be a bad thing; ala liberal
:bounce: Language is important and we are ignoring it..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. "Keep government hands off my medicare."
a) social security isn't a retirement plan, it's insurance.
b) the fact that you've paid the premiums (eg taxes) ENTITLES you to benefits.
c) welfare is the opposite of an entitlement. Welfare beneficiaries are not entitled to benefits except to the degree that legislators see fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
econoclast Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. Despite the fact that SS has been marketed to us as insurance ...
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 11:28 AM by econoclast
Or as a retirement pension plan , you realize that is NOT how the program works. Not DESIGNED to work like that.

Our contributions made during lives fund the benefits of current retirees. If anything is left over it gets invested in US Treasuries. That's how it works. That is how it has ALWAYS worked. That how it was designed. Which is fine as kong as there are always more youngsters than oldsters.

When we retire, our benefits will come from 2 sources - 1: those US Treasuries being redeemed and 2: the contributions made by the younger/working/taxpaying generations.

Currently, there enough taxpayers and Treasuries to support current planned benefits until 2036. After that, if the younger/working/taxpaying generations pay SS taxes at the same percentages that we did, there is only enough revenue to support benefits of about .77cents on the dollar of planned benefits.

The demographic fact us that there will be lots more of us oldsters and lots fewer of those youngsters than ever before. So the question is how many additional dollars do we want to tax those future generations to pay us off in our retirement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. If the wealthiest continued to pay FICA throughout the year, much of the
problem would be solved.....but goddess forbid that! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC