Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Social Security has solvency issues, but they're cutting payroll taxes that support it? WTF?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:01 AM
Original message
Social Security has solvency issues, but they're cutting payroll taxes that support it? WTF?
OK, if you think a program has problems paying out benefits, YOU DO NOT CUT THE TAXES THAT PAY FOR THE MOTHERFUCKER!

That's just basic math, right?

So either they are totally full of crap, and someone is intentionally trying to kill off Social Security, or it is doing quite well for itself.

What's going to happen is that Social Security will now run major deficits, for lack of funding, and then the Republicans can say, "Hey, look, it's already getting into trouble, why don't we just shut it down."

This per the Press Conference earlier when he said they were going to cut the payroll taxes. This is something that already happened last year for a temporary period under the extension of the Bush tax cuts, but now it sounds like they want to continue it.

It's also very frightening to think how bad these negotiations must be going, because there is not a specific proposal they're all trying to sell us on. Just a nebulous kind of thing that has all kinds of bad shit in it, like raising the retirement age or means testing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. It is fucking surreal.
Replay the whole thing and put a Republican president at the podium, and we would be united against this garbage.

They have pulled off something amazing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's just the fact that it just doesn't make any fucking sense...
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 11:07 AM by originalpckelly
unless you are trying to kill off social security and medicare or you are negotiating like a moron with terrorists who want to blow it up.

If a guy comes up to me on the street and says he's going to take all my money AND kill me, I wouldn't start negotiating where to be shot. You know what I'm saying?

That's almost the nuttiness of this whole negotiation process. The Republicans want to kill social security and medicare, and we're negotiating on how do to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Don't worry. Be happy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. From the school of Walker politics, cut revenues and declare a crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. You folks are taking the "narrow" view. Our anointed leaders are looking at what's best for the
country. Starving Social Security is the best way to make it stronger. "Narrow" view folks just can't understand that kind of thinking and it would be best if they left the thinking to the better class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not without raising the cap on Social Security tax . . .
so that money over $100,000.00 can be taxed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Galbraith: Lower the retirement age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. No shit . . . make it go broke so they can claim it's broke, brilliant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. If it isn't broke
break it, so then you can "fix" it. Luckily, Americans aren't fooled. Unfortunately, we the people can't do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think this is a stimulus that's regarded as relatively "safe" politically....
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 11:31 AM by mike_c
The stimulus part is putting a few more dollars into nearly everyone's paycheck every month. But if dems proposed a stimulus payout from the general fund republicans would foam at the mouth. Cutting SS payroll taxes is a relatively safe way to deliver the stimulus-- republicans reflexively happy dance anytime "taxes" are cut, and the long term impacts to SS of reducing SS payroll deductions now are well in the future, when they will be well and truly someone else's problem. In truth, "fixing" the long term solvency issues with SS will simply smooth out the little revenue dip this reduction causes and no one will ever care, while failing to fix them will create problems that will completely mask the effects of this "little stimulus" and for which the blame will fall elsewhere. Win-win all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Soc Sec does NOT have solvency issues; bad scenario here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. info on Soc Sec:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. The FICA payroll reduction is simply a means to destroy Social Security
And our 'democratic' president is leading the charge.

You see, there are other means to give us a tax cut - it is called a tax cut.

This is a cruel way to kill Social Security - plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC