Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ publisher quits, Murdoch’s British chief leaves as mogul tries to stem hacking scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 06:30 PM
Original message
WSJ publisher quits, Murdoch’s British chief leaves as mogul tries to stem hacking scandal
Source: Washington Post

LONDON — Rupert Murdoch accepted the resignations of The Wall Street Journal’s publisher and the chief of his British operations on Friday as the once-defiant media mogul struggled to control an escalating phone hacking scandal, offering apologies to the public and the family of a murdered schoolgirl.

The scandal has knocked billions off the value of Murdoch’s News Corp., scuttled his ambitions to take control of a lucrative satellite TV company, withered his political power in Britain — and is threatening to destabilize his globe-spanning empire.

The controversy claimed its first Murdoch executive in the United States as Les Hinton, chief executive of the Murdoch-owned Dow Jones & Co. and publisher of the Wall Street Journal, announced he was resigning with immediate effect.

<snip>

Hinton, 67, has worked for Murdoch’s News Corp. for 52 years and is one of the media baron’s staunchest allies. He became head of Dow Jones in December 2007.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/murdochs-refuse-then-agree-to-be-questioned-by-uk-parliament-fbi-opens-911-hacking-review/2011/07/15/gIQAwxNTFI_story.html?wpisrc=al_national
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Closer and closer.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. to what?
I want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. To the top dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. to Faux Snooze?
we can hope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't believe Hinton.
I think he's hoping to distance himself from the scandal, but I don't for a second believe that he was ignorant of what was going on, any more than Murdoch. I am glad this is costing Murdoch money, because I doubt we will get real justice in this fiasco. Color me cynical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC