Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Say no to corporate personhood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:44 PM
Original message
Say no to corporate personhood
from the Boulder Weekly:



Thursday, July 14,2011

Say no to corporate personhood
By Pamela White


On Tuesday, July 19, Boulder City Council will hear from members of Boulder Move to Amend, who are asking council members to place a measure on the November 2011 ballot that would call for the abolition of “corporate personhood” — the granting of constitutional rights to corporations as if they were people — and the notion that money is a form of speech. Let’s hope City Council is listening.

Boulder Move to Amend organized in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission, which granted the same constitutional rights enjoyed by human beings to faceless corporations and declared that money in the form of campaign contributions is “free speech.”

But first a bit of history. It wasn’t long ago that corporations had to justify their existence. Formed by charter — a process that required legislation and robust public debate — corporations existed for a limited time and were constrained to specific purposes. They could have their charters dissolved if the corporation violated the law or was found to no longer be of benefit.

It used to take a lot of effort to become a corporation, because the American people, suspicious of power mongers and robber barons, were justifiably suspicious. Laws at the time protected the public, not shareholders. If a corporation broke the law or caused public harm, the human beings behind those actions were held responsible. ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.boulderweekly.com/article-5997-say-no-to-corporate-personhood.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah!!!!
:bounce:

May it pass and spread!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. City of Madison, Wisconsin, calls for reclaiming democracy via amending the U.S. Constitution...
SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN MOVE TO AMEND (SCWMTA) IS SPEARHEADING LOCAL EFFORTS TO ROLL BACK THE EFFECTS OF THE CITIZENS UNITED DECISION.
SCWMTA is collecting nearly 20,000 signatures to place the following resolution on the ballot in Madison:
RESOLVED, the City of Madison, Wisconsin, calls for reclaiming democracy from the corrupting effects of undue corporate influence by amending the United States Constitution to establish that:
1. Only human beings, not corporations, are entitled to constitutional rights, and
2. Money is not speech, and therefore regulating political contributions and spending is not equivalent to limiting political speech.
Visit www.scwmta.org for more information or to get involved.


"This decision was a terrible mistake. Presented with a relatively narrow legal issue, the Supreme Court chose to roll back laws that have limited the role of corporate money in federal elections since Teddy Roosevelt was president." – Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin)http://scwmta.org/informationalFlyer.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Big Vetolski Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. That was back in the day before Southern Pacific Railroad vs
Santa Monica, the Supreme Court decision in the 1880's that first established corporate personhood. During the Age of the Robber Barons. But the City of Boulder can't change Citizens United. Only the American people can do that.

I think we need a Constitutional Convention. The old one has been subverted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ragnarok Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. I can think no singular change...
...that would impact more areas of American life more positively that getting rid of this ridiculous concept of a corporation with constitutional rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Corporations are in no way persons. Especially since they don't die of old age. A rogue corporation
that dominated could go on for hundreds of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC