Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On Elizabeth Warren: From April And May Of This Year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:11 PM
Original message
On Elizabeth Warren: From April And May Of This Year
Warren Shoots to Top of Short List for CFPB Job
By: David Dayen - FDL
Tuesday April 26, 2011 6:10 am

<snip>

So Warren was the emissary sent to Senate Democrats’ offices to warn them about an imminent recess appointment. Which could be herself. And the language here is crucial: a director nominated in May, given the pace of the Senate, cannot possibly get confirmed within a couple months. So we’re headed toward a recess appointment.

The main hurdle, at least publicly, for a Warren nomination was the difficulty or near-impossibility, depending on who you talk to, of getting her confirmed. A recess appointment renders that argument moot. She would be able to lead the agency right from the start, as she has already been doing, and mold it in her image with the full set of powers and authorities.

The more private hurdle was the opposition of those inside the Administration to Warren in a strong consumer protection role. But while I’m sure that still exists, perhaps as high as the Treasury Secretary, the fact that candidates like Ted Kaufman and Jennifer Granholm not only turned the job down, but urged the White House to pick Warren, makes it extremely difficult for the Warren detractors to hold out. The independent power base for Warren, separate and apart from the White House, has worked every angle. And it may just succeed.

Link: http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/04/26/warren-shoots-to-top-of-short-list-for-cfpb-job/

***************************************************************************************

Barney Frank: “Republicans are completely afraid of Elizabeth Warren”
By: David Dayen - FDL
Friday May 27, 2011 12:33 pm

<snip>

Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), the ranking member on the House Financial Services Committee, thinks that the Republican efforts to both block any appointment for the Directorship of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and to now block recess appointments so a Director cannot be installed, comprises an “outrageous abuse of the Constitution,” and must mean that the “Republicans are completely afraid of Elizabeth Warren,” who is currently setting up the bureau, and who is the leading candidate to take it over.

“It’s not an option to advise and consent, it’s a duty,” Frank told me in a brief interview. OK, it wasn’t so much an interview as it was Barney Frank talking to me and then me thanking him for the call. But here’s what he said. First, Republicans in the Senate vowed not to allow anyone to be confirmed – “not just Warren, but anyone” – unless they got their way on gutting the agency. The natural response was to use the Constitutional power of a recess appointment to navigate beyond this. But “now they’re complaining about a recess appointment,” Frank said. “They caused the problem and now they’re objecting to its solution. It’s an incredible spectacle. I’ve never seen the Republicans work so hard over anything than to stop this consumer agency.”

Frank dismissed the constraints that Republicans wanted to place on the agency, which amounted to defanging it. “They want to amend the law so bank regulators have control over what the agency does,” Frank said. “These are the regulators who Spencer Bachus (the new Republican chair of the House Financial Services Committee) said their job is to serve the banks.”

Frank begged off a resolution of this issue through the Senate, saying he wasn’t familiar enough with the rules of that chamber, though he added that “my guess is that a majority can get something done.” But he saw the best avenue for success as raising public pressure over the appointment. He said that Republicans usually pull a frontal assault to get their way – wanting to repeal the health care law or roll back the EPA’s greenhouse gas regulations, for example. In this case, because protecting consumers is popular, to achieve their ends of crippling the agency “they’ll do it in complicated ways.”


<snip>

Link: http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/05/27/barney-frank-republicans-are-completely-afraid-of-elizabeth-warren/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ooooh, Willy, you're gonna get it for linking to FDL!
:evilgrin: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't Worry... I'm Wearing My Asbestos G-String
:D

:bounce:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here Ya Go:


:spank:

:evilgrin:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bwah! Chicken! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Willy, if Obama had ever had any intention of actually appointing
Warren, he could have recess-appointed her long before now. It was never in the cards. It's just a matter of which Goldman Sachs acolyte we get instead. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well Just For Fits And Giggles, Let's Ask Some Other Question...
Let's say that all this is true... Warren doesn't want the job. Warren has set up a super duper agency, and had a hand in selecting the upcoming appointed head. Warren is all good and satisfied.

1) Who in the FUCK is in charge of communications at the WH?

Because that Bloomberg Headline (Obama Eliminates Warren as Consumer Head), and similar variants, is being picked up tonight in paper after paper across the country: http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&ned=us&tab=nw#q=elizabeth+warren&hl=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=sbd:1&sa=X&ei=fPQgTqCmFo64sQPly8VX&ved=0CBYQpwUoAQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=158405ac10b7c632&biw=1024&bih=679 So tomorrow morning the nation, at least the part that does not post at DU, will be reading about how Obama did not pick Warren to head the new agency.

2) Are they THAT out of touch, or do they hate the liberal/progressive wing of the party so much that they are willing to dismiss the possible negative reaction to this news?

3) Why didn't they leak this earlier? Why dump it out on a Friday night? (Ooo, ooo, I know that one!)

4) Are they going to be smart enough to have Elizabeth Warren say or do something to calm everybody down? Like maybe have her there with Obama when he announces, and maybe say a few words in support of the new nominee???

5) Are we dealing with the gang that couldn't shoot straight, or is there something far more cynical going on?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If she came to Washington as an IPA (actual or informal), that
should have been made clear from the start. It would have limited speculation about her being appointed Head. And yes, the timing of this appointment makes me wonder if it's a side deal related to raising the debt ceiling. If that's the case, I don't hold out much hope for getting someone useful in that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Can you summarize the conspiracy for those of us too tired to read this crap?
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 10:20 PM by cottonseed
Obama is a tool of the corporatocracy because ________________. Just help a brother out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Eat Your Peas, And Do Your Own Damned Homework
And thanks for the kick.

:D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC