Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN Poll: Should Bush Tax Cuts Be Allowed To Expire in 2013?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:47 PM
Original message
CNN Poll: Should Bush Tax Cuts Be Allowed To Expire in 2013?
Should President Bush's tax cuts for families making over $250,000 a year be allowed to expire in 2013 as part of a debt-reduction deal?

Yes is currently at almost 80%.

Vote here: http://www.cnn.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about right fucking now? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArnoldLayne Donating Member (871 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes I agree right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. No Shit Sherlock - sooner the better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Precisely
However, yesterday would be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, now!
And can we throw in an old fashioned buttkicking for those who want to keep them?


Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeease?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why wait?....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought they are supposed to expire in 2012? Is that a trick question? n/t
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 11:55 PM by Tx4obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Maybe a change in the law in 2012 would come
into force in 2013. The cuts have been extended for a certain amount of time.

Another Obama double-cross.

Doesn't he know that he has a veto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Article dated December 17, 2010 says Obama signed 2 year extension.
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 12:25 AM by Tx4obama
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20026069-503544.html

p.s. So, it seems they should be expiring January 1, 2013.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Right. So that is why the 2013 date is given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I guess what tripped me up was the question ...
Because I don't understand why they would need to be 'part of a debt-reduction deal'.
They will expire on their own January 1, 2013 and don't need to be included in any deal.

I thought that question, even thought it didn't say it, was like more like: instead of them expiring 'in 2012' should they be included in the deal to expire 'in 2013' (like the end of 2013) instead.

See?

Anyway, now I get it :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Yes. I don't understand why Obama is trying to get so many
issues decided now with the Republicans in charge in the House -- unless he wants to have the campaign issues for 2012 very clearly outlined in the minds of voters.

If so, he is making a big mistake with his "compromise" on Social Security and Medicare. He is on the wrong side of most Americans, even average Republicans, on those issues. He won't get a lot of independent votes based on his stances in that area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Wow, I was under the impression that the publicized period was 13 months. Where
in the world did I get that idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. It is now at 78%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Still at 78%. Love how it's worded: "Should.....on FAMILIES making over..."
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
21st Century FDR Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yes, "families"
You know, like the Koch family, the Rockefellers, the Bush (Crime) Family, and the Waltons (the Arkansas bunch, not John-Boy & Mary Ellen)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. If their intention was to skew the poll towards "no," it didn't work. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
libmom74 Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. They should have expired in 2010
if Obama hadn't caved then we would not be in this situation now with the "necessity" for even more "shared sacrafice", the kind where 98% of us sacrafice necessities and the wealthiest 2% get to keep their extra tax breaks and loopholes for yachts and corporate jets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KelleyKramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bush tax cuts? There are no Bush tax cuts...

I think they mean the Obama tax cuts for the rich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Anybody not voting YES is a fool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. voted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC