Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Taking it to the American people". The People's Budget.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:49 PM
Original message
"Taking it to the American people". The People's Budget.
Support for the People's Budget

Paul Krugman

“genuinely courageous”

“achieves this without dismantling the legacy of the New Deal”

Dean Baker

"if you want a serious effort to balance the budget, here it is."

Jeffrey Sachs

“A bolt of hope…humane, responsible, and most of all sensible”

The Economist

“Courageous”

“Mr Ryan's plan adds (by its own claims) $6 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, but promises to balance the budget by sometime in the 2030s by cutting programmes for the poor and the elderly. The Progressive Caucus's plan would (by its own claims) balance the budget by 2021 by cutting defence spending and raising taxes, mainly on rich people.”

The New Republic


“In passing, Miller also draws attention something that's gotten far too little attention in this debate. The most fiscally responsible plan seems to be neither the Republicans' nor the president's. It's the Congressional Progressive Caucus plan…”

The Washington Post

"It’s much more courageous to propose taxes on the rich and powerful than spending cuts on the poor and disabled."

Rachel Maddow

“Balances the budget 20 years earlier than Paul Ryan even tries to”

The Guardian

“the most fiscally responsible in town… would balance the books by 2021“

The Nation

"the strongest rebuke...to the unconscionable 'Ryan Budget' for FY 2012."

Center for American Progress

"once again put(s) requiring more sacrifice from the luckiest among us back on the table"

Economic Policy Institute

"National budget policy should adequately fund up-front job creation, invest in long-term economic growth, reform the tax code, and put the debt on a sustainable path while protecting the economic security of low-income Americans and growing the middle class. The proposal by the Congressional Progressive caucus achieves all of these goals."

The Washington Post


“The Congressional Progressive Caucus plan wins the fiscal responsibility derby thus far."

Rolling Stone

"This is more than a fantasy document. It's sound policy."

Forbes

"instead of gutting programs for the poor like Medicaid and Medicare, food stamps, and the new healthcare law, the People’s Budget focuses on cuts in defense. It also doesn’t scrap new financial regulations designed to at least partly stave off another massive financial collapse like the one that put us in this mess in the first place."




Budget of the Congressional Progressive Caucus
Fiscal Year 2012


The People’s Budget eliminates the deficit in 10 years, puts Americans back to work and restores our economic competitiveness. The People’s Budget recognizes that in order to compete, our nation needs every American to be productive, and in order to be productive we need to raise our skills to meet modern needs.

Our Budget Eliminates the Deficit and Raises a $31 Billion Surplus In Ten Years
Our budget protects Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and responsibly eliminates the deficit by targeting its main drivers: the Bush Tax Cuts, the wars overseas, and the causes and effects of the recent recession.

Our Budget Puts America Back to Work & Restores America’s Competitiveness
• Trains teachers and restores schools; rebuilds roads and bridges and ensures that users help pay for them
• Invests in job creation, clean energy and broadband infrastructure, housing and R&D programs

Our Budget Creates a Fairer Tax System
• Ends the recently passed upper-income tax cuts and lets Bush-era tax cuts expire at the end of 2012
• Extends tax credits for the middle class, families, and students
• Creates new tax brackets that range from 45% starting at $1 million to 49% for $1 billion or more
• Implements a progressive estate tax
• Eliminates corporate welfare for oil, gas, and coal companies; closes loopholes for multinational corporations
• Enacts a financial crisis responsibility fee and a financial speculation tax on derivatives and foreign exchange

Our Budget Protects Health
• Enacts a health care public option and negotiates prescription payments with pharmaceutical companies
• Prevents any cuts to Medicare physician payments for a decade

Our Budget Safeguards Social Security for the Next 75 Years
• Eliminates the individual Social Security payroll cap to make sure upper income earners pay their fair share
• Increases benefits based on higher contributions on the employee side

Our Budget Brings Our Troops Home
• Responsibly ends our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to leave America more secure both home and abroad
• Cuts defense spending by reducing conventional forces, procurement, and costly R&D programs

Our Budget’s Bottom Line
• Deficit reduction of $5.6 trillion
• Spending cuts of $1.7 trillion
• Revenue increase of $3.9 trillion
• Public investment $1.7 trillion







http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70

Now THAT was a framework to take to the American people. WAS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick and recommend and bookmark.
:kick:

(I am so afraid this will be ignored, not on DU, but 'elseWHere')
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice! Rec'd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. WHY ISN'T THIS BEING CONSIDERED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because it dares tax the income of the plutocrats, who own all the media and politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. ROFLMAO
Welcome to progressive politics.

We propose something that makes sense.

Everyone else either ignores us, or doesn't publish us so the rest of the world won't find out.

Then we get blamed for election losses.

See how it works?

-Hoot

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Because it touches two of the far right's sacred
cows, the military and their wars, and taxing their buddies as fairly as everyone else.

Maybe if we can get a real progressive Congress, we could get something like this passed, and eventually, rescue the presidency from the influences of Wall St.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Instead we'll end up with the "giving it to the American people" plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is really, really good information. Thanks.
k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. As opposed to the "Sticking it to the American people". The Policitians' Budget.
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 01:54 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
Which one do you think will be signed by the pres?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. These people are politicians.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) consists of one United States Senator and seventy five members of the United States House of Representatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. It makes you want to cry, doesn't it?
To know that there ARE good people who are smart enough to run this country efficiently and FOR the people, and that they are not heard because WAll St. has bought the rest of Congress and it would appear, the WH.

Excellent budget. I wish we had a real news media so that there could be real discussions where the Wall St. shills had to face real Representatives of the people, like these.

But it will never pass since it's asking the rich to 'share the sacrifice' and cutting the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And then some. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. Jim Cooper, Blue Dog from Tennessee has made
his bones by being a "sensible, deficit conscious" representative and he doesn't support this. I've talked to him through staffers, by mail, by email and actually IN PERSON about this budget and he still doesn't support it. His excuse? "They didn't even introduce it in the Senate and it couldn't pass the House."

So WHAT, Jimmy? If you're REALLY concerned about the deficit, it would seem like you'd support the budget that closes said deficit in the shortest time with the least amount of pain for the majority of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cuts to military spending, not SS, Medicare, Medicaid
3 Out Of 5 Voters Want To Cut Defense Spending

67 percent disagree with a proposal to reduce cost-of-living adjustments in Social Security and 70 percent disagree with reducing Medicare and Medicaid payments to doctors.

The survey of 2,132 likely voters was conducted from July 8-11.

more: http://njtoday.net/2011/07/12/3-out-of-5-voters-want-to-cut-defense-spending/#ixzz1SJUvcqsw

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. DU Poll
Edited on Sat Jul-16-11 06:39 PM by ProSense
Thus far, the Social Security proposal is meeting a mixed reaction

The overall proposal fares better

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. A kick for the night club. n m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agony Donating Member (865 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. It's the Plutonomy, stupid!
Is

thanks for posting what shoulda been...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. Military Spending Cuts in the budget:


Responsibly End the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

The People’s Budget accounts for an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. As noted above
these operations have cost $1.3 trillion, excluding debt service. The People’s Budget provides
$161.4 billion in OCO funding for 2012 (the funding level in the CBO baseline), after which all
OCO funding is ended. The Congressional Research Service estimates that this sum would be
more than sufficient to safely and deliberately withdraw American soldiers from Afghanistan and
Iraq. Responsibly ending the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq will save $1.6 trillion over the 2013-
21 period, relative to the CBO baseline. Relative to the highly uncertain costs budgeted for in the
president’s 2012 budget, this withdrawal would save $415.1 billion. 25


Reduce Base Department of Defense Spending

Specific proposals for conventional forces include: reducing active duty Army personnel strength
to 427,000 by 2014 (a decrease of 120,000); reducing the Marine Corps personnel strength by
30% to a force of 145,000 by 2014; reducing the Navy by 20% to a fleet of 230 ships; and
reducing the Air Force by 15%, reducing the number of squadrons by 18 of 60. These force
structure savings would total $593.7 billion over the 2012-21 period. Specific proposals for
strategic capabilities include reducing the U.S. nuclear arsenal, cancelling the Trident II missile,
limiting modernization of nuclear weapons infrastructure and research, and selectively curtailing missile defense and space programs. No savings are assumed from TRICARE, the military health care program for active duty personal, military retirees, and their dependents.

These proposals and their respective budgetary impact were compiled by Congressional
Progressive Caucus staff in conjunction with Congressional Research Service staff and provided
to EPI. Overall, these policy proposals would gradually reduce defense appropriations by $692.2
billion over the 2012-21 period, relative to the CBO baseline. Relative to higher spending levels in the president’s budget request, they would represent $816.7 billion in savings over the next decade. In both cases, the savings are well within the bounds of the savings identified as
reasonable by the SDTF report.

Taken in conjunction with ending the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the realignment of conventional and strategic forces would result in $2.3 trillion worth of savings relative to the adjusted CBO baseline.



http://epi.3cdn.net/55d8ba5873e5bd097e_avm6b8rb1.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
22. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC