Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KaBoom!! Rupert Murdoch assembles US legal team over phone-hacking scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 11:55 AM
Original message
KaBoom!! Rupert Murdoch assembles US legal team over phone-hacking scandal
Edited on Mon Jul-18-11 11:56 AM by malaise
Rupert Murdoch is assembling a team of US lawyers with expertise in fighting large federal criminal cases, dan Sullivan, one of America's most experienced lawyers, who over 40 years in litigation has acquired a reputation for taking on difficult and sensitive cases. He represented Oliver North, the US marine corps officer, in congressional hearings over the Iran-Contra affair.


Sullivan was probably brought on board by Murdoch last week on the recommendation of Joel Klein, the former US assistant attorney general who the News Corporation chief has entrusted with leading its internal investigation into the phone-hacking scandal.

The appointment of Sullivan – revealed last week by the New York Times's Dealbook blog – is being seen as an indication that Murdoch is preparing for the worst. In the UK, News International has already set aside about £20m in preparation for compensation payments to victims of its phone-hacking activities, and pressure is now building in the US for criminal and civil legal action.

-----------------
Put on those seat belts DUers!!
:popcorn:

edit subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, Dan! Better get a retainer up front of at least $2 million.
Edited on Mon Jul-18-11 11:57 AM by no_hypocrisy
On edit: Make that $10 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let's hope for the worst! ;) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. FOX NEWS new jingle..."We've got VOICE MAIL!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. it is getting closer...
speculation is that the arrest of Brooks signals big problems for James. See, the claim (from earlier responses right up through the resignation) was deniability... "we didn't know". The arrest suggests evidence says something else.

I think we can't even begin to speculate where all the UK investigation is going to lead. But pulling together this US legal team - big signal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Question - wasn't St Rudy of 9/11 part of this firm?
Was his side kick Kerik involved in the hacking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. kerik made too many mistakes to have been working on 'inside info'.
he was an idiot, that one. Not sure about Rudy and the firm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. If this goes to the SC, John Roberts had better recuse himeself
He has formerly represented Fox.

The fact that the "liberal" media doesn't refer to him as "Former Fox News lawyer John Roberts" continues to astound me. Interestingly, this 2005 (Fox) article concluded Roberts wasn't in the pocket of business :rofl: , but the pertinent information is there for all to see.



"A list of Roberts' former clients may not impress those looking to support the downtrodden. For example, Roberts represented FOX television stations as they sought Federal Communications Commission approval to increase ownership of television stations in order to expand its audience reach."


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163475,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Jump back and color me shocked
:wow: I wonder how entwined ol Murdoch is in our government? Would it be possible our Government is in as much danger as UK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. If we could get rid of Roberts, it would be huge.
I'm not saying that would be enough for me, but it would be an enormous change for the good.

Remember how Roberts apparently illegally adopted two Irish children? I wonder if that could come out in all this? I wonder if the Murdoch empire helped with that, pulling in some chits with officials to let that happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well he might have a 'fit' with all these bad news about
his friends. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
38. disregard
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 02:16 PM by Gin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. There is no reason it should go to the Supreme Court. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow... I wonder where Oliver North received his money to hire
Mr. Sullivan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Jolly Ollie - The Republicon traitor who gave our US Hawk missiles to the evil Iranian Ayatollay
Republicons really do hate America, as Jolly Ollie North demonstrated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. You know the Reagan/Thatcher era may finally end
with the fall of Rupert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. We can dream...
This story just gets better and better. News Corp stock is taking a pounding, too. That's not going to lead to happy share holders :).

I'd love to see some time for James, and maybe even old Rupert. Lock 'em up and throw away the key!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. The pace of this scandal
time for stockholders booting out the Murdocks passed ten minutes after the scandal broke. I don't believe there is going to be much of the empire left for stockholders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unlike Ollie North, Murdoch doesn't have a military uniform to wear during the trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Murdoch doesn't need a uniform to play the victim card, or obfuscate the issue, his
Edited on Mon Jul-18-11 12:44 PM by Uncle Joe
corporate media propaganda machine will do that for him.

On a thread by Towlie



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x614665

Watch, if you can stand to. They roll out some expert, Bob Dilenschneider, to say how hacking is a big problem. It's happened at the Pentagon. It's happened at Citibank. It's happened at the News of the World. When are we going to get serious about it?

HEY, WAIT A MINUTE!!! Citibank and the Pentagon were the hackees -- the objects of hacking, by criminals or spies. Murdoch's News of the World was the hacker -- the perpetrator, the criminal-or-spy counterpart.



On a thread by cal



The Wall Street Journal has attempted to redirect the criticism that has been levelled against its owner, Rupert Murdoch, against the journalists who uncovered the illegal phone hacking and bribery at the News of the World.

(snip)

At the end of a weekend in which Murdoch and top News Corporation executives have made a round of apologies for the illegal behaviour of News of the World, the Wall Street Journal's editorial takes a strikingly opposing posture. It adopts a peevish tone, noting "the irony of so much moral outrage devoted to a single media company, when British tabloids have been known for decades for buying scoops and digging up dirt on the famous."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x614686



This way Murdoch gets to play the "graceful victim" apologizing for his corporate media spawn's immoral, illegal and unethical behavior while having his other incestuous, conflict of interest ridden corporate media spawn spin their propaganda in his defense, they're his uniform.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. This story gets more delicious by the second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. That bus is headed right over a cliff.
Murdoch knows just how big the shitstorm coming his way is, and there is precious little he can do to stop it.

Time to lawyer up, and hunker down.

Murdoch is fucked; the cops he bribed are all resigning, the politicians he blackmailed or paid off are all lining up for questioning, NewsCorp stock is getting it in the shorts, NWS investor and major stakeholder Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is crapping in his pants as he sees billions in his investment go up in smoke.


And that's just TODAY.





Hee. Hee. Hee.


"See How The Mighty Have Fallen!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh JOY OHHHHHhhh the Rapture!!!
This is getting better and better by the minute. You have no idea the pleasure reading your post gave me.

ahhh perhaps you do..:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. LOL
Yes this is getting good. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Nice post
Amazing stuff - the cops resigned because they have no credibility locking up folks or holding an investigation if they are tainted. This is heading all the way up to Cameron. Coulsen may wel be his undoing? That's the problem with achieving power by any means necessary. These men from the play fields of Eton do not think rules apply to them.

I hope Blair gets fugged in the process along with the RETHUGS across the pond. Men must be scared shitless with those police resignations because that means this is serious shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. Turning state's evidence in return for leniency as fast as they can.
Those cops know that they are going to be ground into dust by the judicial system if they don't seek some type of immunity, Murdoch is now beyond the point of helping ANYONE.

They are being thrown to the wolves by Murdoch, and realize that it's every man for himself.

Anyone that is even tangentially part of this entire disaster and has half a brain will now rat out anyone and spill his guts to save his own ass.

No one is coming to their aid from NewsCorp, they are all on their own.

The entire British political leadership that made a Devil's Bargain with Murdoch will fall in disgrace.




The weaker sisters here in the states are getting a little...anxious...about all the bad news about their good friend and benefactor Murdoch.





Hee. Hee. Hee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I think Yates will end up in prison but Stephenson
will escape with the removal of the title.
Someone should ask Jon Stewart to Interview Chris Wallace about now. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. "On advice from counsel, Mr Wallace will respectfully decline the offer of an interview."
See: Enclosures.

Dictated But Not Read.



Signed:

Ikonoklast

Counsel for Mr. Wallace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wouldn't it be just awful if this legal team were hacked
so that all their voice mail, email and computer files were made public? Anonymous could do it illegally. NSA could do it legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. What about Rupert?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, malaise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Ahhh! Life is good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. wow...
Ka-boom is right...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Tick tock, the lawyer's on the clock.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. I like bumpy rides
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. Wheeeee!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Wheeeeeeeeee is right
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Remember Me Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. Do you have a link?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Oops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Remember Me Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC