Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Believing that Loughner is/was psychotic doesn't mean giving a pass to the

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:06 PM
Original message
Believing that Loughner is/was psychotic doesn't mean giving a pass to the
wingnuts and their violent rhetoric. It doesn't mean one is falling for a media story. Recognizing complexity and duality doesn't make anyone a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's precisely these deranged, delusional types
that the hate messages from Palin, Beck, Limbaugh and others are aimed at inflaming into action. The psychosis provides a level of cover, of deniability, between the instigator and the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The psychotic mind can take information from any source
and weave it into a pattern. Not saying he wasn't influenced by hate messages from the right, but he could also have been influenced by passages from "The Phantom Tollbooth". Again, that in no way excuses the rhetoric that flows from Palin, Beck, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Thank you!
That's what I'm wondering about this guy--what if they was no Tea Party, no Obama, etc would he still have lashed out violently? I get the sense maybe so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think all those wingnuts with their violent
rhetoric are are psychotic to one degree or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That is too easy an excuse.
In fact, it's a blanket dismissal of their fears. Do you have to be psychotic to be easily frightened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No, just really, really STOOOOOPID. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. That's a hateful slam on the mentally ill.
the mentally ill are far more likely to be victims of violence than be violent themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You know damn well what I meant
I'm sick and fucking tired of people here always looking for the slightest hint of racism and any other perceived hidden deep dark hatred that a DUer has.

I'm not going to explain myself to you because you already have me figured out and want to have a fight with me. I know of people who read DU but dare not ever post in case they say something that someone here thinks is not politicly correct and jumps them for it.

Yeah I make hateful slams against people all the time don't I. Shit. I think I'll just continue my fucking day without DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Big money, who funds the hate machine, is counting on using "but he was crazy"
Edited on Sun Jan-09-11 01:17 PM by valerief
as a TP defense in the public arena.

I'm so glad we have Homeland Security protecting America from crazy people with guns, especially crazy people who paradoxically have the lucidity to invoke their fifth amendment right when arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. yes, I'm sure they are
and yes, psychotic people can indeed be laced with seeming lucidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thank you for saying that.
We should hold all the enablers responsible in a court of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well said - rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Exactly. I think it will turn out that Loughner is schizophrenic, or,
in layman's terms, nuttier than squirrel shit. But isn't that part of the problem? All this violent rhetoric the wingers love to spew tends to inflame crazy people to act violently. People who aren't mentally unbalanced in some way are not inclined to run out and shoot a bunch of people. For most people, even most teabaggers, the violent bullshit of the Pain/Beck crowd is understood as metaphorical and not literal. But there are plenty of people out there whose elevator doesn't go to the top story and who are unhealthily influenced by extremists' conspiracy theories. Those are the ones who will incorporate the rhetoric into their own paranoia and act on it.

That's not to say one would have to be literally psychotic to do such things (although it helps). The legal definition of insanity is quite restrictive -- you have to either not understand the nature of your act or not realize it was wrong. Loughner may or may not fall into this category. Other assassins have been medically and/or legally "sane," but nevertheless unbalanced enough to think killing someone for political reasons is an OK thing to do. This fits the general definition of terrorism, and not all terrorists are actually insane. But their worldview isn't normal. The rhetoric of the Palin/Beck crowd stirs up the delusions or sense of victimhood of those who are disturbed enough to commit acts of violence against some perceived oppressor.

I suspect that most of the rhetoric is not specifically intended to have this effect (at least in most cases -- as to Glenn Beck, I'm not so sure). But the RW love of guns and their tendency toward primitive, hypermasculine chest-thumping leads them to talk this way to prove how tough they are. But whether or not they intend the results, they own them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. When my brother went psychotic he burned down the family church,
and tried to burn down the VA hospital, but that was before hate radio and tv. Every mentally ill individual has their own individual obsessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thank you cali. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
udbcrzy2 Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. I thought he was being silent
I didn't think Loughner was talking. I wouldn't give him the insanity defense so quick.
He won't do any prison time if they acquit him of these murders. He has to be examined
by a shrink and that person makes that decision, I guess along with a judge? I think
the dude is just an evil loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. his writings and anecdotal evidence are all over the net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yup. It is exactly such people that are most suseptible to such rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Eactly. The Environment of Hate-filled speech set the stage
and actually gave him permission. The Tea Party has been
given so much positive attention ( no matter how screwy
many incidents were) that it could lead individuals
to believe any of their weird beliefs were ok. When
you have one Party setting themselves as totally
correct and the only way; while disparaging the other
party as "wrong", bad immoral, people with a newly found
sense of their own power are bound to go off the deep
end (if they have any emotional or mental weakness.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. anyone who shoots innocent people in this manner is not mentally
healthy in my opinion. We may want to comfort ourselves with the thought that those who do this are fundamentally 'separate' from "us"- but the reality is, that the potential for this kind of violence exists in all of us.

The attitudes and ugliness that have been promoted by the media/shock-jocks/ and radical political fools FEED this terrible side of human'kind'.

I agree Cali- despite whatever mental illness this young man may be found to be suffering from, the rhetoric and glorifying of violence in our society is something we do have the means and power to control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yep. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. yeah, when pols right and left used the word ''senseless'' it seemed like code for ''don't read
anything into this.''

Much like after 9/11, we weren't supposed to ask any questions after they offered up the imbecilic ''they hate us for our freedom'' explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. yeah, when pols right and left used the word ''senseless'' it seemed like code for ''don't read
anything into this.''

Much like after 9/11, we weren't supposed to ask any questions after they offered up the imbecilic ''they hate us for our freedom'' explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC