Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

San Francisco To Shutter Courtrooms; Lay Off 200 Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 07:04 PM
Original message
San Francisco To Shutter Courtrooms; Lay Off 200 Workers
SAN FRANCISCO -- The San Francisco Superior Court announced on Monday that it's laying off more than 40 percent of its staff and shuttering 25 courtrooms because of budget cuts.

Presiding Judge Katherine Feinstein said the actions were necessary to close a $13.75 million budget deficit caused by state budget cuts. She said the cuts mean it will take many more hours to pay a traffic ticket in person, up to 18 months to finalize a divorce and five years for a lawsuit to go to trial.

"The civil justice system in San Francisco is collapsing," Feinstein said.

Some 200 of the court's 480 workers will be let go by Sept. 30, including 11 of 12 commissioners who preside over a variety of cases. And she said it could get worse if optimistic revenue projections don't materialize by January.

Read more: http://www.ktvu.com/news/28586520/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Big Vetolski Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. But, but, surely banning circumcisions and Happy Meals will solve
this crisis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What does that have to do with the budget, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Big Vetolski Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It takes money to enforce those things, no? Probably not that much,
but I'm saying San Francisco has its priorities skewed in ways worthy of ridicule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL. The right wing stereotypes are funny, especially on a liberal board.
The circumcision ban was floated by a wing nut, not by the city, and is being challenged by the ACLU.

The Happy Meal ban is not hard to enforce because there aren't that many McD's in San Francisco. It's not like they're going to try to create a black market for Happy Meals. LOL

On the other hand, San Francisco does have a health plan that has to be funded and at some point the supervisors decided that was more important than keeping all those courtrooms open. Sad for the lay off, though.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Big Vetolski Donating Member (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I did not know about the health care plan, or I had forgotten, so...
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 06:15 PM by The Big Vetolski
thanks for pointing that out. Still, this nanny state crap of regulating what people can eat, or defining circumcision as child abuse(ludicrous!) or, as is now being proposed by some, to place fat kids in foster care while simultaneously voting for policies that keep fattening foods at a lower cost than vegetables is latte' liberal hypocrisy at its worst, and San Francisco and Boulder, Colorado are shining examples of it.

They disgust most Americans. And they should.

Policies like that give liberals a bad name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC