Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Murdock based his media empire on right-wing, not left wing, populism.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:00 AM
Original message
Why Murdock based his media empire on right-wing, not left wing, populism.
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 07:11 AM by pampango
Money, of course! But more specifically to generate great wealth (populism attracts lots of readers) while simultaneously protecting the new wealth by using right wing blame-shifting tactics. Make people believe that society's problems aren't related to rich people and corporations not paying their share of taxes, but are caused by a variety of "others", e.g "union members, gays, foreigners, uppity women, and racial minorities."

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/07/18/jeet-heer-on-murdoch-couldnt-have-happened-to-a-sleezier-guy/

Why has there been such a persistent affinity between right-wing populism and tabloid journalism? A simple economic explanation might suffice: To own a newspaper such as The News of the World, you have to be very rich. To make the paper a going concern, you have to appeal to a wide swathe of readers. Left-wing populism might gather a crowd, but it creates the danger that your own wealth might be expropriated if the message is too successful. So it is safer for a newspaper baron to put out a paper targeting minority groups rather than the rich. Right-wing populism is a way for plutocrats to wear the mask of plebian outrage, pretending to be the voice of the very people they are economically exploiting.

Despite all his pretended faith in the free-market, Murdoch’s success has always owed much to his uncanny ability to align himself with governments that were able to dole out lucrative broadcasting and cable monopolies. Not just in China but in the West as well, Murdoch has been an expert practitioner of crony capitalism. Again, we see the large element of fraud inherent in right-wing populism.

The comedian and actor Steve Coogan, himself an alleged target of the News of the World’s phone hacking antics, described it as “a misogynistic, xenophobic, single-parent-hating, asylum-seeker-hating newspaper.” Coogan’s characterization might be extended to the Murdoch press as a whole, which tends to go after any group that doesn’t adhere to the ideals of middle-class white society. The characteristic stance of a Murdoch newspaper is that of defending putatively “normal” tax-payers against various supposed parasites and weirdos, an eclectic and elastic category that includes union members, gays, almost all foreigners, uppity women, and racial minorities.

What are we to make of this remarkable history of ethnic enmity? First of all, there is no evidence that Murdoch himself is personally bigoted. Murdoch’s third and current wife is of Chinese ancestry. Rather than being a garden-variety bigot, Murdoch is something fouler: an intelligent man who has found a way to make money trafficking in racial animosities he himself doesn’t necessarily share.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Several things.
Smaller words. Yes, language that someone with a 4th grade education can understand.

Emphasis on pictures instead of lexicon (words). Refer to prior 4th grade education comment.

Appeal to the emotion instead of the intellect under the guise of
"common sense" or "conventional wisdom".

Using simplistic explanations to make complex issues into bite-sized brain morsels.

Appeal to the masses. You're aren't alone. The publishers of the tabloid and thousands of its readers agree with you. Or is it the other way around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. an astute interpretation?
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 07:41 AM by luckyleftyme2
Hardly more than an overeducated response trying to put down the truth of the subject;or worse yet give that superior attitude of knowing more while in reality having less common sense than an over protected child.
the article is both clear an precise and sounds almost verbatim of the daily tripe we hear from the right.
of course thats just my observation,quite the opposite of yours!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. When you make populist appeals, you need the language and a message
that resonates.

My list incorporates effective use of populist tactics, not condescension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Why can I not understand your post?
I've read it three times, but I'm getting nowhere. Is it in English? (The first "sentence" has no verb despite its length, and its semicolon. You misspell "and". You don't capitalize or use proper spacing.) But more to the point, I simply cannot make out what you think you are saying.

Are you responding to @no_hypocrisy or to the original National Post article? The article rips Murdoch a new one. @no_hypocrisy provides a concise summary of the Murdoch media game plan. In response, you say the article is "both clear an precise" but then you say it sounds like right-wing tripe. Say wha'?

I think what galls me about your comment this morning is that you have the nerve to mock someone else (whoever it is) as "overeducated" after writing an unintelligible mess like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 08:42 AM
Original message
to you an ur right wing friend

I find the article true in my opinion; I also noted like you your friend who browbeat undermine the article as well as the poster. But if you want my opinion he is using a
very effective tool of the right to discourage the acceptance of the subject.
something the right has used to hoodwink the public for years!
I hav sen a stuy that regarless of the splin or fomut evn a nerd evenuly kin figu it out!
Ihope that clarifies thye message and the effect it had on me an the majority of
readers in here.
now I have to go play golf with three of my republican friends who's golf game is as good
as their ideas. (translation =I let them win about 6 holes )
I donate the money I win from them to the homeless shelter . ha ha ceya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've always found it laughable that the company OWNED BY A FOREIGNER...
thinks it can tell Americans what it is to be an American.

There is no question about Murdoch's place of birth: he's a fucking Aussie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. yes and hardly a liberal

I find it amazing how the right constantly claims the media as liberal while being owned
by the conservatives. Think about it he owns the washington post,Ted turner started cnn
their both strong conservatives. They both let you know where they stand as it's their nature. If you are their employee I'm sure if you are liberal you would want to keep your job so you wouldn't go to far out on the limb of liberalism!

of course that's just my opinion; And another is many of our businesses have foreign investors!
remember money has no heart,no soul, no family and especialy no loyalty to any nation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Murdoch's policy must have been to redefine the term "foreigner" in each country.
Of course, the "foreigners" that Murdoch's media outlets warned about were not, for the most part, Australians, Americans or British. They were Muslims and Africans (in the UK), Hispanics and Muslims (in the US) and Muslims and Asians in Australia.

I'm sure Murdoch was happy making money promoting fear of foreigners (not to mention "union members, gays, ... uppity women, and racial minorities") in all his countries of operation even if it required adapting the target to conform with local fears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Well, not only was he not born in Britain; he's *not a citizen* and he *doesn't live here*
and yet his papers are full of xenophobia and British jingoism.

Actually most of our newspapers seem to be owned either by foreigners, or by people who are British by origin but choose not to live here so that they don't have to pay British taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. It isn't about the money, it's about the influence and propaganda
when it comes to Murdoch's newspapers.

Ensuring they're popular (with celebrity stories etc) ensures the propaganda goes further.

It's entirely possible to have a titillating newspaper or magazine that has no political agenda. That isn't the case with Murdoch's papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. He's peddling bullshit - right wing morons are the obvious market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. For The Left Were To Counter and Mimic Murdoch, They'd Have To...
Have a topless woman interview Norm Chomsky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. ah yes

like ole barnum said theirs a sucker born every minute and you certainly help to embellish this as fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. it's easier to print lies than to research the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC