Aerows
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:18 PM
Original message |
|
OMG. She said that he wasn't paid, while James Murdoch already established that he had.
:popcorn:
|
Dappleganger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It was only a matter of time. |
|
One lie always leads to another.
|
Aerows
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. They got caught up in their own lies |
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Awesome. This was the point of the hearings .. nt |
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
Aerows
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Almost too many names to keep track of |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 01:27 PM by Aerows
But I'll have that guy's name in a second. Thanks for kicking it to the top :)
Edit: So much is rolling out, it's hard to keep track
|
Bumblebee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I believe these were about two different events so the excitement may be premature... |
Aerows
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
so, no, they aren't.
Under British law, statements before a committee of Parliament, or before a House of Commons, and judged as sacrosanct, in that, you can't change your mind. That's why everyone was stuttering.
|
Bumblebee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. they were talking about two different things -- that's what I meant by "events" |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 01:40 PM by Bumblebee
and, actually, two different people. I do think the thread misstates what really happened and therefore raises false expectations
|
Aerows
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
won't be sharing a cell, but based upon today's testimony, and UK law, it will take contortions of the highest order to keep them both out of jail.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Unlike a congressional hearing in the U.S. |
|
There will surely be someone in this hearing who remembers what was said before. Here, whatever is said goes into a compartment, totally isolated from anything that went before or that comes after, so if James testifies "X" and Rebekah says "not X," nobody here would call out that little contradiction.
|
GreenTea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Murdoch, Brooks & company sounds just like the lies and false promises of British Petroleum (BP) |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 01:37 PM by GreenTea
and of course in the end it was all spin, lies and empty promises - and a polluted dead zone in the Gulf by these greedy lying corporatist & the republicans who protected them.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
and some will pay the price
|
provis99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:40 PM
Response to Original message |
12. her opening statement was a pack of lies. |
|
From her phony apology, to her claim that her lawyer was only there to "smooth things along".
|
Aerows
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
I view anyone trying to smooth this over with extreme suspicion. She flat out said they did bribes.
What part of "sent to jail, with good reason" do these people not understand?
James will be joining her within the week.
|
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Well, just assume that they're both lying.
|
emcguffie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
16. for those of us who did not see it, please -- |
|
-- Who is the "he"? And what was he paid for, or not paid for?
Thanks.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |