LuckyTheDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:40 PM
Original message |
If the Gang of Six proposal is adopted... |
|
... then, in a broad way, Obama gets pretty much what he wanted. Is that right?
|
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'd agree with that -- I think this the GOP's attempt to save face politically |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 03:45 PM by rocktivity
They've finally come to realize that this is not a political winner for them (hence McConnell's worrying about it hurting the Republican "brand"). By the Gang endorsing what Obama wanted, they can claim that they are capable of compromise, though they didn't get a thing they wanted!
:headbang: rocktivity
|
woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It was the plan all along. nt |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Well, you're right, but you're wrong |
|
See, anything good that might come out of the Gang of Six proposal would indeed be what President Obama wanted. Anything bad would be a tough choice forced on the president by political realities, and you don't quite understand the process, you dirty fucking hippie. And, if some of the good things (tax hikes on the wealthy) had to be sacrificed to get a bill (that cuts social security and medicare), it's because Something Had To Be Done, and you can't really fault Obama for acting quickly to head off a potentially disastrous development. We'll fix it all later, mmmkay?
|
dbonds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
LuckyTheDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. I don't entirely disagree (nt) |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 03:50 PM by LuckyTheDog
|
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
xchrom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. You are not terrified enough of possible (nameless republican here) |
|
Winning.
You need to be more terrified.
|
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. That about sums it up. |
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
14. Like the public option... and DADT... n/t |
vi5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
That about summed it up as succinctly and brilliantly as I've seen on these here pages.
|
Abq_Sarah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I can't see the House going along with the Senate proposal.
|
LuckyTheDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Well, then, if we default... |
|
... it'll be on Boehner and the Tea Party.
|
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Then I'm quits with the Democratic Party. |
|
Then we are all fucked and have no political representation.
|
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. +1 Whether he gets what he wants or not, who cares. The American people are SCREWED |
joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Oh yeah, he's a closet republican...a vote for obama is a vote for |
|
turning the democratic party even farther to the right.
|
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
BOG PERSON
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-19-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think we should just trust our president in every decision he makes and should just support that, you know, and be faithful in what happens.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:37 AM
Response to Original message |