Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barney Frank WILL NOT vote for Gang of Six deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:35 PM
Original message
Barney Frank WILL NOT vote for Gang of Six deal
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2011/07/19/barney-frank-will-not-vote-for-gang-of-6-deal/

Barney Frank: Will Not Vote For Gang of 6 Deal

I spoke with Barney Frank today about the current debt ceiling debate. He said he would not vote for any bill that raised the debt ceiling which included cuts to Social Security or Medicare benefits, including a chained CPI, which is included in the Gang of 6 deal. Frank has been a supporter of increasing, not decreasing, the way cost-of-living adjustments to Social Security are calculated. ”Old people use a lot more medicine and buy a lot fewer ipods” he said, referring to the way that increases are currently calculated.

“We did a crusade for a cost-of-living increase last year, and there was some resistance in Democratic leadership, so they put it on the suspension calendar” he said. The decision of Democratic party leadership to bring the legislation up under a “suspension of rules” meant that it could only pass if two-thirds of those present vote in favor of it. So despite the fact that a cost-of-living increase for Social Security recipients had a majority of votes (254-153) in 2010, it fell short of the two-thirds threshold needed for passage.

I also asked if he would support a debt ceiling bill that included a commission to make budget recommendations which would receive an up-or-down vote in congress, reportedly a feature of the McConnell-Reid plan (Catfood Commission II). Such commissions have historically been the way that congress passes unpopular legislation, and Social Security slashers have been pushing for one for years.

“The only commission I ever voted for was the base closing commission” said Frank. He said that he would vote for a “commission that makes recommendations,” like Simpson-Bowles. “But if it’s got any kind of parliamentary advantage, then no.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:37 PM
Original message
I hope my phone call helped
He's my Congressman. Although I suspect he'd have voted against this debacle without any urging on my part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. damn, i wished i lived in a deep blue district
i imagine the public transportation and coffee would be better

I've got Sandy Adams. pffft.


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good! It's just a tax cut for the wealthy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. One hero stands up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Durbin & Reid just said it isn't happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Three heroes stand against the tide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. FFS, It isn't going to happen. There is not enough time for it to go through the process before the
Debt Ceiling is reached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why would Dem leadership have required 2/3 last year?
Was this tied to something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. it was too politically "hot" -- you know, with the economic populism and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC