Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: Unauthorised tapping or hacking of mobile communications

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:27 AM
Original message
Report: Unauthorised tapping or hacking of mobile communications
http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/home-affairs-committee/news/110720-phone-hacking-report/

Publication of Report

The Committee “deplores” News International’s attempt to “deliberately thwart” the original investigation into phone hacking in 2005-06 but also states that the police set aside a huge amount of material that could have identified other perpetrators and victims.

The Committee agrees with John Yates’s own assessment that his 2009 review of this investigation was “very poor”, that he did not ask the right questions and that he was guilty of a “serious misjudgement”.

The Committee criticises Andy Hayman’s cavalier attitude towards his contacts with those in News International who were under investigation which, even if entirely above board, risked seriously undermining confidence in the impartiality of the police, and accuses him of deliberate prevarication in order to mislead the Committee. It urges the swift and thorough investigation of allegations that payments were made to police officers by the media, which will help to establish whether or not such payments may have influenced police inquiries into phone hacking.

The Committee welcomes DAC Sue Akers’s decision to contact all potential victims of phone hacking by the News of the World as part of the current investigation, but is alarmed that only 170 have as yet been informed. At this rate it would take years to inform all of the several thousands of people potentially affected. The Committee therefore recommends that extra resources are allocated to her investigation, by the Government directly if necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. If only our congress could communicate as succinctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yea, we don't talk so good ovah heah.
:thumbsup:

P.S., listening again to Met testimony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I meant the scads and scads of legalese.
A committee report in plain English? Whoda thunkit.

Met testimony was great this morning (er, yesterday morning). I liked how they handled it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC