Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we don't raise the debt ceiling Treasury's bank balance on Aug 3 is zero.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:51 AM
Original message
If we don't raise the debt ceiling Treasury's bank balance on Aug 3 is zero.
The Bipartisan Policy Center studied Treasury Department receipts and expenditures for August 2009 and 2010 and determined that the government likely would not have enough revenue to pay the full $23 billion payment to Social Security recipients due on Aug. 3.

On that day, according to the analysis, the government would take in about $12 billion in taxes and other revenue but would owe $32 billion, creating a $20 billion shortfall. It happens to be the first Wednesday of the month — the day a majority of Social Security recipients get their checks.



http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/06/29/257003/debt-ceiling-social-security-cuts/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. The debt ceiling will be raised. The only question is what the deal to do so will look like. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It wasn't til I saw it like this that I realized we really are broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I don't think the public really knows what financial trickery the Treasury might use...
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 11:34 AM by PoliticAverse
to pay bills in the event of no debt limit increase by Aug 2.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. We have no idea what will transpire -- and it is by no means certain that hte ceiling wil be raised.
Our political system is simply broken; and it is not clear how it can be fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Too bad that graphic isn't on our 24/7 news channels or the front page of every newspaper. There's
a LTTE in the local paper today from a lady in a very heavy GOP district about emailing her Senators and her newly-elected Tea Party Rep. asking them to pass a law that she will continue to get her Social Security check. Claims President Obab 'is threatening us that we may not get of Social Security checks in August."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. It amazes me that the Republicans are willing to DESTROY the economy
to make political points.

I am starting to feel like they are ready to push the country off the cliff. The people who will suffer most are the majority of Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Where is the overdraft protection......?
I, and millions of other Americans, have overdraft protection with our bill paying checking accounts. The US has never defaulted and certainly has good credit. Default, my ass.

And by the way, 'balanced budget amendment'? My ass, again. Instead of an amendment that would cripple the economics of the nation, how about an automatic debt ceiling rise mechanism that would kick in regardless and in spite of the antics of the political parties.

The Founders feared factionalism in the new nation they created. Politics playing with our economic life lines needs addressing at the constitutional level so that the political parties cannot hold hostage the full faith and credit of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The US actually (inadvertently) defaulted on some T-bills during the 1979 debt-limit crisis...
It was only $ 120 million but it happened and there was a lawsuit about it.

See: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/07/11/politics/washingtonpost/main20078437.shtml

The US also defaulted on securities a couple of other times in history but those were not debt-limit related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. Broke, huh? Gosh I wonder how that happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Haven't they already borrowed all the .gov pensions and the emergency fund
that is used to prop up the stock markets in the event of a crash?

I'd gather that means we're already at zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes they've been using financial trickery to actually reach the Aug 2nd date. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is not surprising.
Wages in America have, on the average, not risen much compared to dollar value, in the past 40 years.

Yet spending on the military and on health care have skyrocketed. And since the 2008 depression started in the heartland, so has spending on things like food stamps, unemployment benefits, early Social Security benefits and similar programs to help people subsist.

The real problem is much more serious: creating jobs.

And to create jobs here we have to change our trade policy.

There is no way we can continue to import so much Chinese junk and outsource so many clerical and other jobs and have a large enough tax base to pay the cost of maintaining our infrastructure, our military and keep our children educated and our elderly breathing.

So, the focus should be on rewriting our trade agreements.

We need import taxes not just on products but also on services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC