Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Wish People Would Use The REAL Words They Mean, Not "Reform" or "Modifications"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Sportsguy Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:31 AM
Original message
I Wish People Would Use The REAL Words They Mean, Not "Reform" or "Modifications"
when what they really mean is cut, gut, & destroy. This applies across party lines imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Or what about "slash?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hear Hear, Sir!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. My favorite is "strengthen". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Some actually mean reform or modify
vs cut/gut and destroy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. a useful distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. That would be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps Activists should develop ads which explain how they
use language to confuse, and distort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Even worse is when they tell us the "modifications" and "reforms" are good for us or unavoidable.
Will someone please introduce Obama to his veto pen and give him instructions how to use it as a negotiating tool or preventive measure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. I believe there has been a systematic attempt to distort the language
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 01:32 PM by starroute
Once upon a time, "reform" meant to improve, generally by removing the potential for corruption. In the 1950s, for example, my father belonged to a Reform Democratic Club in New York that was fighting Tammany Hall.

But somewhere along the line, the word "reform" came to be attached to anything that could be touted as a simplification or streamlining of the system. This goes back at least to the Tax Reform Act of 1986:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Reform_Act_of_1986

The U.S. Congress passed the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA) (Pub.L. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, enacted October 22, 1986) to simplify the income tax code, broaden the tax base and eliminate many tax shelters and other preferences. Referred to as the second of the two "Reagan tax cuts" (the Kemp-Roth Tax Cut of 1981 being the first), the bill was also officially sponsored by Democrats, Richard Gephardt of Missouri in the House of Representatives and Bill Bradley of New Jersey in the Senate. . . .

The top tax rate was lowered from 50% to 28% while the bottom rate was raised from 11% to 15%. Many lower level tax brackets were consolidated, and the upper income level of the bottom rate (married filing jointly) was increased from $5,720/year to $29,750/year. This package ultimately consolidated tax brackets from fifteen levels of income to four levels of income. This would be the only time in the history of the U.S. income tax (which dates back to the passage of the Revenue Act of 1862) that the top rate was reduced and the bottom rate increased concomitantly. In addition, capital gains faced the same tax rate as ordinary income. . . .

The Act also increased incentives favoring investment in owner-occupied housing relative to rental housing by increasing the Home Mortgage Interest Deduction. . . . To the extent that low-income people may be more likely to live in rental housing than in owner-occupied housing, this provision of the Act could have had the tendency to decrease the new supply of housing accessible to low-income people. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit was added to the Act to provide some balance and encourage investment in multifamily housing for the poor.

Moreover, interest on consumer loans such as credit card debt were no longer deductible. An existing provision in the tax code, called Income Averaging, which reduced taxes for those only recently making a much higher salary than before, was eliminated (although later partially reinstated, for farmers in 1997 and for fishermen in 2004). The Act, however, increased the personal exemption and standard deduction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC