Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Raw Story: Court rejects harsh federal sentencing guideline for Ecstasy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 03:29 PM
Original message
Raw Story: Court rejects harsh federal sentencing guideline for Ecstasy

Court rejects harsh federal sentencing guideline for Ecstasy


By Eric W. Dolan
Saturday, July 16th, 2011 -- 1:50 pm


U.S. District Court Judge William H. Pauley III on Friday rejected the federal sentencing guideline for MDMA, or Ecstasy, ruling that the guideline was based on outdated science and punished ecstasy-related crimes far too harshly than was justified.

Ecstasy has been used by 14.2 million people in the United States alone, according to the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, and is known for increasing feelings of empathy and social connection.

The American Civil Liberties Union presented the federal judge with scientific evidence from expert witnesses during a two-day hearing in December, claiming that the sentencing guidelines were flawed.

The decision came in the case of Sean McCarthy, who pleaded guilty to a single count of conspiracy to possess and distribute Ecstasy. He was sentenced to 26 months in federal prison as opposed to the 63 to 78 months recommended by federal guidelines.

“We commend Judge Pauley for recognizing that the 10-year-old sentencing guideline for Ecstasy is based on flawed assumptions and repudiated science,” said Scott Michelman, staff attorney with the ACLU Criminal Law Reform Project. “Unnecessarily punitive drug sentencing guidelines play a major role in exacerbating our nation’s costly problem of overincarceration, and we urge the U.S. Sentencing Commission to undertake a thorough and scientifically grounded re-evaluation of all drug guidelines.”

In 2001, United States Sentencing Commission determined that penalties for Ecstasy should be greater than penalties for cocaine. The Commission claimed that Ecstasy was neurotoxic, marketed to youth more aggressively than cocaine and was both a stimulant and a hallucinogen, while cocaine was only a stimulant.

Pauley accused the Commission of "opportunistic rummaging" of facts and ruled that the Commission's analysis was "selective and incomplete," noting that Ecstasy is "one of the least addictive drugs," unlike cocaine.

Read full article at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/07/16/court-rejects-harsh-federal-sentencing-guideline-for-ecstasy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Outrageous...
Usage should be compulsory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC