Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I was just looking at my 2010 Social Security Statement.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:36 PM
Original message
I was just looking at my 2010 Social Security Statement.
Between me and my employers, $147,290.00 of that fund is my damn entitlement.
They can cash me out right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe we should all do that
Send in our statements and demand OUR money NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me and mine will be lucky to get Eighty of that back. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. And demand what your employers paid, too. That's an equal amount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. That money has been spent on people who needed the insurance
What you paid were insurance premiums, not any sort of cumulative investment.

You'd be just as successful demanding your car insurance payments over the last 25 years returned because you didn't have any accidents and you could use a new car now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. A chunk of it wasn't spent on people
It is the "surplus". In theory it is still there. However it is looking more and more like that surplus will simply have been spent on useless wars and tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. 2.x trillion hasn't been spent at all.
As we have been WAY OVERPAYING through FICA for the last 30 years. That mother f'ing surplus was supposed to be the cushion needed to fund the boomer retirement, and the only crisis is that billionaires want to keep their surplus funded tax cuts instead of paying us our pensions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd be happy just leaving it alone because that was the deal, but if they want
to break that deal, all bets are off. They already got me for about ninety grand though my 401k.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Supreme Court has already ruled you have no right to that money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. If I don't have a right to get it back
Then I have right to the benefits promised in exchange for it. I will absolutely not tolerate the outright theft of that money, I worked too damn hard for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Ah, no you don't have rights to it.
"The Supreme Court has established that no one has any legal right to Social Security benefits. The Court decided, in Flemming v. Nestor (1960), that "entitlement to Social Security benefits is not a contractual right"."

"The noncontractual interest of an employee covered by the Act cannot be soundly analogized to that of the holder of an annuity, whose right to benefits are based on his contractual premium payments. Pp. 608–610. (b) To engraft upon the Social Security System a concept of "accrued property rights" would deprive it of the flexibility and <363 U.S. 603, 604> boldness in adjustment to ever-changing conditions which it demands and which Congress probably had in mind when it expressly reserved the right to alter, amend or repeal any provision of the Act."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_%28United_States%29#The_Supreme_Court_and_the_evolution_of_Social_Security
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Well
To hell with them and to hell with the whole goddamn US government then. If they are going to treat us like that as far as I'm concerned the whole goddamn lot of them should be put in stocks and pubicly whipped. I've worked like a damn dog for over 30 years only to be stolen from... this doesn't sit well with me at all. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I think many are upset 'cause they believed SS was a bonafide, firm contract.
If one works hard and pays into the system their entire working lives, when they retire, they'll be guaranteed medicare and a SS check. However, that is not the case and it's something I myself just found out about when this debate began recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
17.  I'm curious
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 08:34 PM by guitar man
As to what to call something you make hard earned payments into all your life with no guarantee of ever getting anything in return for it. If they belly it up and go south with our money, I'd say a revolution is in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. ...
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 08:47 PM by guitar man
Delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow.
I don't know how to read those things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Page 3 right smack in the middle of the page. It even shows how much you paid into Medicare. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. It's quite a walk down memory lane with those statements...
I just grabbed the ones I've saved since 2000 thanks to your post. My contributions start when I was a junior in high school, and I'm now pushing the half-century mark. Oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Mine start in 1979
Dishwasher at Walgreens restaraunt. I can look over all the years and remember what I was doing to earn the money I paid in for any given year. I wonder if the billionaire bastards that want to steal it have any idea what I've done over the years to earn that money. Somehow I doubt it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Oh, the glamor!
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 09:06 PM by WorseBeforeBetter
My first contributions came from a front desk clerk gig at a local high school during the summer school session. I was up at oh dark hundred and bored out of my mind.

The BBs are so far removed from us that they don't know and don't care -- we're just cheap labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I'm glad we get that ever year. My first year was 1969 I made $556.00.
I was a bus boy at a super club. I saw the Ink Spots, Frank Fontaine, and others while working there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Kewl. 1979 was a little more "exciting" for me.
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 09:49 PM by WorseBeforeBetter
I had a part-time gig selling soft-serve at the Capital Centre. Scoping guys and taking in the very end of concerts and hockey/basketball games -- much simpler times!

I guess this year we'll all be downloading the statements from SSA. In light of proposed cuts, I can hardly wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yeah really cheap
I was sandblasting on a swinging scaffold underneath an offshore oil rig that was jacked up and being overhauled in the shipyard. Hot, hard nasty work but it paid,eh, ok anyway. The guy next to me took a bad step and fell to his death, about 80 feet below. Before they had even removed the body the foreman was barking at us to get back to work, and I did because i really needed the job.

I've always wondered what it would be like to be priveleged enough not have to ever have to make such decisions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Geez, that's horrible...
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 10:23 PM by WorseBeforeBetter
but not an unexpected management reaction. Sadly, many of the FUX-brainwashed masses would be quick to respond with "Tough, he knew the risks." Miners, soldiers, fire-fighters...I've gone 'round and 'round with wingnut neighbors and coworkers over this too many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree
I've said it before, if they want to do away with SS, fine, I'll take my money back, all of it, in cash please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. That is what Wall Street wants you to do and to invest it into your stock
or bond of choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Me and some friends want cash so we can go in together and buy us a Congressman. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Think of all the people who have contributed and died before they
are entitled to their entitlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. I actually heard this as one idea: pay back the under 35-40 year olds and tell
them, it is over for you...etc. Take care of the older ones with the monies available...Until it all runs out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. Sorry, but it's already gone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC