GOPBasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 11:50 AM
Original message |
So are Democrats going to act like this when a GOP president needs the debt ceiling raised? |
|
Will Democrats make demands such as taxing the rich more in return for raising the ceiling? That's the question.
|
CleanGreenFuture
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
1. No. The difference this time is that a shock doctrine event is upon us. |
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
25. and a bipartisan one, at that. |
The Magistrate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
2. This Is The Problem, Sir: An Adversarial System Depends On Both Sides Fighting |
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Of course not. They'll bend over and ask what type of lube the Repubs would like. |
Ezlivin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. Republicans don't need lube |
|
They just jam it in.
Boom goes the dynamite.
|
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
4. No.... for the most part, Democrats are grown ups that care about the country |
former9thward
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
23. Our party (including Obama) voted against raising the debt ceiling in 2007. |
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. Enough Democrats voted for it to allow it to pass.... |
|
If they needed the votes, they would've gotten them.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
5. No, we won't 'act like this' because we're rational and not spiteful. |
|
Unfortunately this often puts us in quandaries such as you suggest.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Wouldn't work because a Republican prez would never adopt the Dem narrative... |
|
And he or she would use every tool in the toolbox.
|
daa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Nope they will bend over just like they did for Reagan and chimpy |
vi5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Not as long as any of our current pathetic leaders are in charge.
Of course the Republican president won't need to, because a "Democratic" president will have done the lion's share of the work for him.
|
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
9. at the risk of repeating myself, again |
Drale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Theres probably not going to be a debt ceiling after August 2nd |
|
because its going to be declared unconstitutional. Theres not going to be a deal, because the GOP will never let it happen.
|
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
12. No, there were at least two instances where raising the debt ceiling was tied to more war funds... |
|
while bush was president, never heard anything from the Dems.
:(
|
eilen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
13. It would never have gotten this far. |
|
At the first sign of resistance, the Republican president would invoke the 14th amendment, raise it anyway and sneer at the Democrats "whaddya gonna do?" Then tell the American people such action was needed for the nation's security.
The Democrats would then have hearings or some other expensive timesink and might even dispatch an investigator/adjudicator ala Fitzgerald/Plame/Libby matter but it won't happen until 2 years later and 3 more debt ceiling lifts and no one will care.
|
Zywiec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Obama voted against raising the debt ceiling when he was a Senator |
|
so I would say this games continues...
|
theophilus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Only if more cuts to the poor are needed. Then, I guess so. n/t |
QC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
16. No, they will roll over like they always do. n/t |
Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Good cop bad cop does not work that way. You never reverse the roles. |
|
The good cop stays the good cop, and the bad cop stays the bad cop.
|
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Without Dems there would be no GOP - it takes two to tangle |
DirkGently
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Of course not. They'd be labeled insanely irresponsible anti-American idiots. |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-21-11 12:58 PM by DirkGently
|
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
readmoreoften
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Democrats will only win again if they're allowed. |
|
And then they'll do what they're told. Kind of like this time.
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Not a chance. No way. No how. When a GOPer is back in the WH, we'll return to "deficits don't matter" mode.
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-21-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
24. Look back to the actions of the Democratic congress when |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |