Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wouldn't it be lovely if this happened to Lil Jimmy Murdoch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 07:03 AM
Original message
Wouldn't it be lovely if this happened to Lil Jimmy Murdoch
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/blog/2011/jul/22/phone-hacking-scandal-live-coverage
<snip>
12.27pm: James Murdoch could be imprisoned or fined if the House of Commons finds he told lies to the culture select committee this week, writes Owen Bowcott, the Guardian's legal affairs correspondent.

Imprisonment or a substantial fine could theoretically be imposed as a punishment by parliament on anyone who told lies in evidence to a select committee.

Misleading MPs is deemed to amount to a "contempt of the house" in the same way that refusing to answer a summons to appear before a committee is reported to the Commons. The offender could then be summoned to the bar of the House.

The problem is that the sanctions - involving fine or imprisonment - to enforce any punishment are constitutionally somewhat rusty. Vernon Bogdanor, the former professor of government at Oxford University, has suggested they may have fallen into "desuetude" (disuse).

The House of Commons is not believed to have fined anybody since 1666 and has not "committed anyone to custody", apart from temporarily detaining them, since the 19th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh please...they did everything but wash that man's car for him while he was being "questioned".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. while not likely
did I read that there is a move in Australia to look into limiting their broadcast presence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep check this -PM says James Murdoch has 'questions to answer'
So does the PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14245922
<snip>
David Cameron says James Murdoch "clearly" needs to answer questions in Parliament after his evidence on phone hacking was challenged.

Labour MP Tom Watson has asked police to investigate after Mr Murdoch's evidence to MPs was disputed by two ex-News of the World executives.

Mr Murdoch said he was not "aware" of an email suggesting hacking went wider than a single "rogue" reporter.

But ex-NoW editor Colin Myler and legal manager Tom Crone said they told him.

-------------------------

So will Myler and/or Crone have an unfortunate car accident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC