Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How the hell is this a "win"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:34 PM
Original message
How the hell is this a "win"?
People are cheering in the halls that Boehner walked.

Yeah, it makes Obama look good - but how is that a win?

The only way it's a win is a Tigerblood Addonis DNA Charlie Sheen kind of Winning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go be depressed somewhere else please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Are you happy about this?
You must be kidding me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 05:38 PM by tridim
Obama is leading strongly and the GOP just lost 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Dollars to donuts, I don't think Obama considers this a "win"
The Republicans are messing with the base mechanics of government

Like I mentioned in an earlier post, this is not Obama's fault

It IS the Republicans fault

And this just means that we will probably default, with full Republican approval
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
44. You're happy that millions of people in the poor, working and middle class are going to lose
Lose some of what little financial security they have left? You're happy that millions of elderly people, both now and in the future, are going to have to get by on less and less.

Kind and compassionate you're not, happy that people are going to suffer, but hey, we'll get re-elected come next year:puke:

Cut into SS and Medicare, and I doubt that any Dem will win. It will be lose-lose for all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I am extremely happy. The deal Obama tried to make was mostly taking away our social security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. No, the deal wasn't "taking away SS"..
Read the transcript when it's available. The deal cut zero from SS and Medicare benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. excuse me? and the 3 trillion dollars were coming from.....
raising the age to retire by two years is equal to a 12% decrease in benefits. (That's official, not from me.)
you can pretend it doesn't take away benefits if you want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I await your official link.
That's not what the President just said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. he just said he was willing to give 75% of 4 trillion dollars from social security and medicare. tha...
That equals 3 trillion.

links are all over DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Don't you get more by postponing retirement?
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 05:47 PM by dkf
Have we seen the schedules they would be offering?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. no. You get two years less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. No. There is a schedule that reduces the amount based on how much earlier you retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. of course. That keeps the same pot. nothing to do with the deal. which would remove
two years of pay. you wont get that back later.

if citizen X has a fund of 10,000 in retirement. if you divide that by 10 years it will be more per month than if you divide it by 12 years, obviously.

but that is not what they were negotiating about.

apples and oranges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. If you retire later your monthly payment may go up in a retirement plan of your own at work.
Yes that is true. In this case it was simply reducing the number of people receiving benefits, hence reducing the benefits. nobody was going ot get more because they waited two years. the pot doesn't stay the same size, and you get more per month. that would be a private retirement plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. Only if you live long enough to collect it,
...and are healthy enough to keep working those two extra years.

Raising the age SUCKS when you Work for a Living.
No two ways about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. If you watch Obama's speech, you will see he says current retirees would not have social security cu
cuts. he is clear about that. that means the rest of us would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. If you think you won't lose more over the consequences of default you don't know what's up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. The corportations already said raise the debt ceiling. It will be raised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I always pretend that everything you say is in Stewie's voice. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Soooo reminiscent of Newtie's idiotic QUIT (R) & FAIL moment...
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 05:38 PM by SpiralHawk
What a pack of quitters the Republicons are. If their fatcat billionaire puppetmasters aren't getting Republicon Welfare for the Rich, they throw a tantrum and QUIT. Quitters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama's looking like an extension till 2013 in the debt ceiling
lets hope we take enough seats in 12 to make it easy and the next Speaker is a Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wooosh!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. BECAUSE Obama was not able to give them our social security!!! no deal.
the deal would have been terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. People are so used to Obama caving hard, him just being snippy is...
...considered by some a resounding WIN! It's sad. There are political points scored by Obama's statements, no doubt, but this is far from over. And it ain't over till it's over.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Obama caved alright. but thank god the Repucans wouldn't. They wanted more blood.
Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. LOL! It's the definition of a political clusterfuck if there ever was one!
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. I know it's weird, but I am so relieved, and still so scared they still ma make some deal.
I dont want anymore DEALS!!! not in my name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choie Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. I agree with you Poll_Blind..
We should be thrilled with Obama because he, once again, made a good speech? WTF is wrong with people? Don't they understand that this is kabuki theater? I don't believe anything that either participant in these "negotiations" say in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
41. +1000.
"People are so used to Obama caving hard, him just being snippy is...
...considered by some a resounding WIN!"

Just had to see that again - sad but true!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Shut the front door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. /facepalm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I'm not talking about the cuts
Yes, they were bad - but Obama did what he had to to get the debt ceiling raised

The GOP is playing chicken

But now there will NOT be a raising of the debt ceiling

Checks will bounce, government will shut down

Yes it will make Obama look good - but in the meantime people will be hurt

This is what the President was trying to avoid, and for very good reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leontius Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. No he did not do what he had to do, he did what he wanted to do
McConnell offered a way out last week, all he had to do was take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. What was that way out?
14th amendment?

He (Obama) doesn't think he can pull it off - and I tend to trust Constitutional Scholars on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leontius Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. The votes to allow the Congress to disaprove of the President
raising the limit while at the same time allowing him to raise it by vetoing the disaproval. Yeah it doesn't make sense to me either but it is supposed to be legal and binding somehow. I don't have a link but maybe a search for 'McConnell debt limit plan' can find the details. I'll try to find it and post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
econoclast Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. A "win" in the lexicon of 21st century American politics defined...
"It's ok of things turn to shit ... as long as the other side gets blamed for it. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialshockwave Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why is DU
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 05:51 PM by socialshockwave
all happy about a possible economic depression? I know you guys disagree with the Republicans(I don't like half of what they are doing, either) but...really? You'd see your country in the dumps just to prove a political point? :/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. Partisanship vs governing vs patriotism.
There are those who are more into partisanship than patriotism, or, rather, they equate the two.

Patriotism is wanting the best for your country; humility says that you can be wrong and, in a democracy, the country isn't a subset of the population but the entirety of the population.

Partisanship is wanting the best for your party; taken to an extreme, it means that you think what's best for your country *is* what's best for your party. Sort of like "What's good for GM is good for America." Of course, a corollary is that "the people" are those like yourself, in your party. The others aren't really people and shouldn't be represented in a democracy.

Now, I don't really care which a person goes with. I think one is more reasonable and reasoned, but the other is fairly harmless if held by a powerless minority of the population. What's wrong is when partisanship is is taken as a principle for governing. Then the government is to be institutionally biased towards one group and only one group is to have power; the government is to be an extension of the party and to preferentially do things to help the party and the partisans. It moves democracy from a form of government for the common good and general welfare to being one who's primary purpose is to despoil others. If a sufficient portion of the population holds by this view, then the democracy is dead except in the sense that 50% + 1 can enslave or confine the other 50% - 1 in a kind of popular dictatorship.

In this case, what's more important for some is that their Hero (in the sense of Hector and Achilles) has stood up and vicariously restored their honor by saying something nasty and mean about the others. Now, if something truly horrible happens, they have an out: "It's not my fault, Mikey did it." As long as they can hold themselves blameless and make somebody else look bad, it doesn't matter. A 20-year depression, massive amounts of poverty and homelessness reaching 20% of the population? Eh. "Not my fault. I didn't do it. I can't be held responsible."

* bore no responsibility for anything bad because it was all Clinton's fault; Obama bears no responsibility for anything bad because it's all *'s fault. It gets tedious, and it's one reason why I figure I stand a better chance teaching high school kids than elementary school kids. At least high schoolers stand a chance of "manning up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
43. "I don't like half of what they are doing, either"
????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. I do not understand what went on in that meeting but I for one will not
breathe easy until my social security check is in my account. I am glad so many of you are happy - me, I am just depressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. I figured it out, it is a 'win' because we haven't had our heads chopped off yet.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 06:32 PM by Rex
Obama offered us up for sacrifice and the racist pigs in the GOP wouldn't take it out of their hatred for his skin color...he offered them MORE and they turned it down.

That is teh best I can come up with.

We avoided a bullet, today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
39. Its a win because we like platitudes and playing a losing defense
It is mind numbing to me how the spin in small sectors runs. We are letting the Republicans frame the debate and we are playing a losing defense but cheerleading seems to be the way of the world. Sing me a song, and pull my string with platitudes and I will dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC