|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 05:52 PM Original message |
Stop it with the 14th Amendment stuff. The President said he would go with McConnel's plan, NOT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. tha'ts assuming the Tea Party will let it thru... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. So what happens when the Supreme Court rules it un-Constitutional? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'm pretty sure that Scalia's corporate benefactors won't let that happen. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That may be, LJ. I can't dispute that possibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Bring Roberts, Alito and Thomas up on charges of treason? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. As far as can be found, there is no one with standing to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptRandom (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. yes SIR! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. The President didn't say he would use the 14th, he said he would run with McConnel's plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. And again.... you assume the Tea Baggers would let it thru.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'm not posting about what the crazy fucker Teabaggers will or will not do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Then you better have a reality check.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Man, I could give less of a shit about your deference to the will of the Teabaggers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Good Gawd Man.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptRandom (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. yeah, but doesn't the prez need to sign something from congress in order to -do- it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Cap't.. you got it in one. n/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptRandom (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. *whew* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tokenlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
9. But if Congress fails--wouldn't it be better for Obama to take bold action??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. "If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator," |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tokenlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. If the worst predictions of default impact are true--then I'd rather have Obama act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. It has zero to do with a 'dictatorship'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freshwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. FDR took unprecedented actions after the USA essentially went broke. It might happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. maybe. A smart person wouldn't even give a hint that that is what they might do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. You mean just like "Obama was gonna give away the big three" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
23. Obama won't/can't do it and said so today: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:25 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. He said he wasn't persuaded.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. If he were to be persuaded or thought he might, why would he tip his hand now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. He's talked to his lawyers?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-11 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
27. Uh I think the gloves are off, finally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC