Major Garrett is with MSNBC now?

[Ruby the Liberal]

Glad Cenk is out of there. "Access focused" indeed.

I can't believe they hired that Fox "news" hack.

[AngryOldDem]

1. No. He's with National Journal. n/t

[Ruby the Liberal]

2. Why was his smarmy self on my screen? He is a "Contributor" now?

[immoderate]

3. Should they filter out anybody without proper liberal credentials?

Like FOX does with conservatives?

--imm

[Ruby the Liberal]

4. I would prefer to listen to Pat Buchannan or Ann Coulter

Point taken. The guy is a snake though.

[immoderate]

5. And the Washington Wizards was a good basketball team.

But their job was to play against the World-Famous Harlem Globetrotters!

It's like pro wrestling, you need villains. MSNBC has to put a credible opposition onto the field. Buchanan is a legitimate political All-Star, his encounters with Rachel boosted her career. Michael Steele has creds, is telegenic, and is funny in a goofy sort of way, a great addition.

I'm not a great fan of Major Garrett but I think he chose journalism over FOX. He was a "liberal" there. I don't know what he has to add except playing that opposition role to provide "balance."

--imm

[Ruby the Liberal]

7. Can I admit that Michael Steele has grown on me?

:hide:

[immoderate]

8. I find him very likable...

--imm

[Ruby the Liberal]

9. !

Priceless :rofl:

:toast:

[immoderate]

10. That's what I see when he is on the screen.

Think of a dummy that needs no ventriloquist.

--imm

[11 Bravo]

11. That was the Washington Generals. (My Wizards suck, but damn, dude, give us a break!)

[immoderate]

12. Yikes! should have seen that. I'll try to correct but I think it's too late.

On edit: Too late -- my apologies to the Wizards, the Generals, Washington and all of DU.

--imm

[in_cog_ni_to]

6. Yes, yes they should. n//t