Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton: I Would Invoke The 14th Amendment To Raise The Debt Ceiling ‘Without Hesitation’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:14 PM
Original message
Bill Clinton: I Would Invoke The 14th Amendment To Raise The Debt Ceiling ‘Without Hesitation’
Maybe Obama should listen to The Big Dog:

Click here to get Bad Bill's take on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh please... lots of people, including me, were saying it before DINO Bill ever said anything.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 08:18 PM by ClarkUSA
DINO Bill is so clueless that he actually said that a brief debt default would not be calamatous:
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=bill+clinton+debt+ceiling+not+calamatous&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What's the difference who says it?
DINO Bill, DINO Barack or even you. If it works, it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Because the OP is presuming that Pres. Obama has never thought of this himself.
You're right, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I made no such assumption (or presumption), and
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 08:33 PM by man4allcats
if you believe you can read my or anyone's thoughts, you may want to seek professional help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Of course you did. Your OP is posited on your wanting Pres. Obama to listen to Bubba.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 09:03 PM by ClarkUSA
That requires a presumption that Pres. Obama hasn't thought of it himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I merely suggested that it may be of benefit for him to do so.
That in no way implies that I wish; i.e. want, him to do so. I would add that there is no presumption that President Obama hadn't thought of it himself. He may well have. It is, however, plausible that he might benefit from listening to the opinion of another, especially when that other is someone who has held the same job President Obama now holds. Your reasoning ability seems questionable. Given that you also seem to harbor some delusion about reading people's thoughts, I really think you should seriously consider that professional help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You are too funny.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thats not the verb I would use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Sixth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I am totally sure you didn't purposely mislead all of DU by leaving this out
"We regret if there has been a misinterpretation of a comment President Clinton made about raising the debt limit. President Clinton did not in any way mean to suggest that a default would not be highly damaging for the economy even for a very short period of time. He inadvertently misspoke. What he meant to say was that if a vote to extend the debt limit failed in advance of a default, that might not be harmful for a couple of days, but that if people thought that we might actually default, that in his words 'we were literally not going to pay our bills anymore, then they would stop buying our debt.'"]

It was right at your very own link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. That's the CYA backpeddling by his spokesperson after Bubba's shit hit the public's fan.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 08:51 PM by ClarkUSA
Say, aren't you happy President Obama has certified the repeal of DADT? Guess he's not a homophobe, after all. :sarcasm:

I'm surprised we haven't heard from Bubba on this to make an apology for ever having signed DADT in the first place. Oh well, maybe he can do a twofer when President Obama repeals DOMA. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yes I am
and I have been out of town for the week or would have commented sooner. If you disbelieve me you can search my name and find pretty much no posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I get so damn tired of the ignorant crap about DADT and Clinton.
Guess you preferred Senator Sam Nunn and Senator David Boren's (both Democrats) plan they cooked up with Colin Powell and were trying to flank Clinton with even before he arrived at the WH. Clinton's position in the general election was that he wanted gays to serve openly in the military. The Democratic establishment went crazy. They plotted against that policy. They tried to out-flank him with a complete prohibition on service. DADTDPDH was the best Clinton could get and far better than what the Dems wanted and what was then current policy.

Go read the wiki entry and educate yourself. Then shut up about DADT because you don't know a damn thing about it. You have used this tripe over and over again because you actually think you can make Obama look good by making Clinton look bad.

Those of us who were around and in the movement and paying attention back then know that at best you are flat out dishonest.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Thank you! Before Clinton, gays could not serve at all and people's sex lives were scritinized
Edited on Fri Jul-22-11 10:45 PM by tblue
and some were blackmailed. I remember how DADT went down. Within the first month of his presidency, Clinton tried to overturn the total ban, but he caught such tremendous flak from rightwingers and the military for even bringing it up. And then Powell and the others devised this compromise and Clinton took it because it was better than nothing and the best he could do at the time. President Clinton deserves kudos for having the balls to take this on and find a wnontoxic stop the witch hunts and the total prohibition.

I remember how the whole thing went down and I will defend Clinton on this every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. During the last presidential primary the Obama camp
found it necessary to change the facts around DADT in order to paint Hillary with an anti-gay brush. It has worked and I would guess that a majority of gay folk under 40 are misinformed on this matter. I suppose it will be another 10 years, after Obama is out of office, before the facts can begin to sort themselves out and the lies exposed.

As for straight people, such as the poster I responded to, they just use DADT to try and bully us gay folks into "liking" Obama. I am tired of being bullied by a hand full of these mouthy straight people with their own agenda and one that has absolutely nothing to do with my human rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. i''m sure bill got it from you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. He's not my type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton sums it up, short and sweet...
From the article:

Lifting the debt ceiling “is necessary to pay for appropriations already made,” he added, “so you can’t say, ‘Well, we won the last election and we didn’t vote for some of that stuff, so we’re going to throw the whole country’s credit into arrears.”

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Makes sense to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now that Boehner and the others have walked out, he may have
the ability and the mandate to do it. We'll see. But I can picture repubs trying to ruin his presidency with impeachment attempts. I would hate for us to have to go through that again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think Bill sees the writing on the wall so he is now quoting it to be seen

as the author



He isn't




Nothing can pass The House, therefore the 14th amendment path is the only option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I think you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. You're right -- nothing can pass The House. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. "...which some scholars have interpreted..." Even the constitutional
experts seem unsure as to what would happen if Obama took this route. Maybe he's looking into it, putting out feelers?

What a fucking mess. I hate Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. If the 14th were Obama's ace in the hole, why should he tip his hand now?
That would not be smart. After all, he said today: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4931348


"There's a provision in our Constitution that speaks to making sure that the United States meets its obligations, and there have been some suggestions that a president could use that language to basically ignore this debt ceiling rule, which is a statutory rule; it's not a constitutional rule," Obama said.

He said, "I have talked to my lawyers ... They're not persuaded that that is a winning argument."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-11 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. There comes a time when you have to bypass broken traditions and do what is right...
regardless of the kicking and screaming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC