WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:00 AM
Original message |
"...the Congress writes the laws and you get to decide what you want to sign,” Boehner said,...... |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-24-11 10:00 AM by WinkyDink
“As I read the Constitution, the Congress writes the laws and you get to decide what you want to sign,” Boehner said, recounting what he told the president, according to two sources. Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/59718.html#ixzz1T2EOk4wx~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What a cocky SOB.
|
Tennessee Gal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
1. So send him something he can sign, you arrogant ass. nt |
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Couple good articles on where the Republicans are at these days: |
Tennessee Gal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
Obamanaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
35. Perhaps the president shouldn't sign just any old thing. Tax cut extensions |
|
come to mind.
Hard to blame some things on congress when they don't have to override a veto, because there was none to override.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Well, that's more or less how it works. +1 on Boehner is a cocky SOB |
phantom power
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Anybody can write a bill. Congress gets to vote on it. The President gets to sign or veto it. |
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Note the "more or less". If you get a chance, take a look at the |
|
articles by Joe Conason and Steve Benen I linked above. Really good analysis of why Boenher and the Republicans are so fucked up and dysfunctional.
Boehner is worse than a cocky SOB.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
14. " I’ve got the same responsibilities as the President.” |
Cool Logic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't understand the point you are trying to make... |
|
Congress does write the laws and the President either signs, or vetoes them.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. It's a message to Obama to quit being involved in the negotiations. |
|
and deliver an "up or down" signing/veto
Obama - like every President before him - influences the lawmaking by indicating what he needs to see in a bill before he'll sign it. Boehner's essentially telling Obama to STFU.
An Obama veto would make it easier to shift the blame to him for fucking things up. They'd just say "hey, we got something through congress, but Obama won't sign it!" Nevermind that what got through Congress was a piece of crap.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. Boehner has said he "has the same job as the President." Arrogant p***k. |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-24-11 10:24 AM by WinkyDink
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
26. Oh I guess that was true of Pelosi in 2007 |
|
Except probably not. Republicans speak hypocritically always.
|
jberryhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
27. Typically, it is a waste of time for Congress to pass stuff the president won't sign |
|
So it makes a lot of sense for them to agree on something before just wasting time on stuff that won't be signed.
|
BumRushDaShow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
5. FDR vetoed 635 bills (regular and pocket) |
moondust
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Is he afraid of the 14th Amendment option? |
|
(Which would make him and the Teapublican hostage-taking ploy irrelevant.)
|
Make7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Boehner: "Never once did the president ever come to the table with a plan." |
|
One day prior to uttering the words in the opening post.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Yeah, he always wants it both ways - what a clown! |
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
11. It's true that Congress writes the laws - and the prez should've been perfectly clear EVERY DAY... |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-24-11 10:19 AM by polichick
...that he would only sign a clean debt ceiling bill - could still do that.
|
FBaggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. Except that it isn't true. |
|
He'll pretty much have to sign the bill if Congress passes it.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. He can veto if he chooses - and he should veto anything but a clean bill... |
|
If he had said that from the get-go we wouldn't be in this place now.
|
FBaggins
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. He "can"... but he really can't. |
|
Any bill that reaches his desk will necessarily have some Democratic support. At that point it's impossible to blame republicans for "shutting down the government" because it will be entirely up to him. Sign the bill and keep it open of veto it and the shutdown is entirely his fault. Then he has to argue why he would "rather shut down the government than (insert spin here)".
If he had enough political capital to pull that one off, we wouldn't be where we are now.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. imo he pissed away his "political capital" by going the way he did - THE PEOPLE are... |
|
...his real political capital and he refuses to stand with them.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
24. As long as you are willing to live with the default |
|
And blame it on the republicans.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
28. They've only taken it so far because they knew he'd move far to the right... |
|
I'd say enough is enough - bring me a clean bill. Dems and mainstream Republicans would manage to get a clean bill to his desk (with Wall Street threatening them).
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
|
How do you know? Mainstream Republicans? Last time I checked, there were not non-fanatical, rational Republicans.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. Mainstream, meaning "Corporate Whore Republican." |
earthside
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Now if only President Obama would finally fully comprehend the power that he has ... demand a clean debt ceiling rise and promise a veto of anything else.
Obama should have done that months ago.
Instead, we are likely to get what Pat Buchanan has been predicting: a debt ceiling extension with the $3 trillion in cuts that the Biden group already agreed to -- the 'great compromise' from the Repuglicans being that the debt extension will go past the next election.
I'm sorry, but Obama has so messed-up this whole debt ceiling kerfuffle, in my opinion.
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
So he can get all of the credit for the default, then.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:16 AM
Response to Original message |
23. Seems I recall Boehner and the Repubs insisted the President get involved... |
|
..in the debt limit talks? Am I wrong?
|
Major Hogwash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Wow! Boehner didn't waste any of his 7 years in high school getting an education, did he? |
|
Fuck, he is smart. I didn't think he knew all that.
But then, Obama has those executive statments that he can sign, too. Mueha-ha-ha!!
Forgot about those, huh, Boehner?!?
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
30. What he's really saying: |
|
It is the responsibility of the Congress to pass a debt ceiling, not the Presdient's responsibility. He reads the Constitution correctly. In fact, the President should never have been in this debate.
|
DFW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message |
32. “I take the same oath of office as the President of the United States" |
|
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
OK, someone PLEASE tell me when John Boehner took THAT oath of office.
Oh, wait, this is the same clown who read from the Declaration of Independence on national television and said it was the Constitution. This guy swears to live by the Constitution, and doesn't even know what's in it. No wonder he doesn't know the difference between the oath he took and the one Obama took. Bonehead's oath might as well have come from inside a fortune cookie.
|
Snotcicles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
33. The President would have a lot fewer gray hairs had he told them |
|
bring me a bill, but if it has this, this, and this in it, blamo, veto time baby.
|
polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
36. True, it would be easier for him and it would show he's willing to use his power. |
handmade34
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Republicans says this out of one side of their mouth and then bitch that the President has no plan out of the other...
|
Zenlitened
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
37. Some of Pres. Obama's most ardent supporters have made that same argument in the past. - n/t |
jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message |
38. I'm so tired of Bonehead's "the president didn't bring a plan to the table" |
|
The thing is, we don't know if he did or didn't do that, because the Republicans aren't going to look at anything this president does fiscally unless it's all spending cuts partially offset with tax cuts--IOW if the GOP wants $3 trillion in deficit reduction over the next 10 years, what they want to see is at least $4 trillion in spending cuts combined with $1 trillion in tax cuts. ($6 trillion in spending cuts plus $3 trillion in offsetting tax cuts would be better.)
Since the GOP loves to commingle macroeconomics and microeconomics, the equivalent "family budget" thing would be paying for $20,000 in Christian School tuition by cutting $30,000 of non-contractually-obligated spending and taking a lower-paying job. If you can think of anyone who would actually do that, please point him out.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:09 AM
Response to Original message |