Oaths to teabaggers, oaths to Norquist, oaths to God...

[Horse with no Name]

does it not dawn on these fuckwads that the ONLY oath they are supposed to take is the one to serve their COUNTRY?

I don't understand this at all.

No wonder our country is so damned divided.

[LaydeeBug]

1. and that's actually a "pledge". nt

[glinda]

2. Juvenile.

[cmd]

3. these oaths are treasonous

The oath that counts is the one they took when they were sworn in.

[AndyTiedye]

4. Norquist/Koch/Murdoch OWN Them

I think the recent revelations of the activities of some of Murdoch's other properties may shed
some light on just how the reich wing keeps its minions in government under control.

[indepat]

5. Could it be Republicans in large part subordinate their oaths of office to protect and defend the

Constitution to other oaths, such as to Norquist et al? :shrug: :patriot:

Edited to insert protect for preserve

[applegrove]

6. And they want f r e e d o m !!! Why take all these oaths if you truly want to be free.

[LeftishBrit]

7. Oaths to teabaggers and Norquist?

I could certainly produce a whole string of oaths ABOUT such people as teabaggers and Norquist!

[robcon]

8. The ONLY oath is to their country?? Why can't anyone take any oath?

1st amendment is still valid.