|
And, of course, the 24% of 30 - 40 year old "middle class" who are still on unemployment rather than working retail because they're out looking for the jobs they can pay the mortgage on rather than giving up and living the Wal-Mart Life.
Mr. "Stay at home and play video games" either has an indulgent parent (or spouse) that would rather he not take a job below his "qualifications" and wait until there is an opening, or he could actually be unemployable. Despite the Calvinist stigma of "not working" and "entitlement expectations" - most retail jobs no longer have benefits and are not cost and effort effective to take on as a primary method of support - especially since there is little upward mobility, and unless you are at a high-ticket item store that supplements with consignment and bonus payments (or tips), you're basically working for pin money now-a-days. Back in my early days, and my parent's generation (and I'm in my 50's) - a single parent or person could make a living working as a full-time cashier in a grocery store, local hardware store, or at Sears - they could make rent, perhaps a cheap car payment, have basic medical expenses met, and still not have to take on a second job to make ends meet. If they worked hard enough, they could make manager and get a salaried job with real benefits, and start living a "middle class" life - taking vacations, buying a house instead of renting, maybe putting the child with the most promise through college...
Now-a-days, getting a full-time position in retail even if you are a manager is next to impossible in the larger cities - most of the businesses are impersonal chain stores that if they are required to provide benefits due to union activity, do everything in their power to cut costs and ensure that no employee below, say. a district manager qualifies for any sort of benefits or salary because an constant increase to the national profit margin every quarter is far more important than the community any one store is in. Labor is expensive, and if there are few bean-counter incentives to view employees as anything but productive tools, then most employees are considered disposable as soon as they reach a certain cost, no matter how "friendly" the company tries to portray itself. And with wages having actually gone down in some fields (entry level electrician with basic certification - 1990 - $13.50 with full benefits; same position with more requirements and certification, 2010 - $12.50 with fewer benefits), there's more profit being made at the levels most of us can't attain.
Many retail companies and chain restaurants get subsidies from the DoL and tax breaks for new hires and "trainee" hires - usually for six months per employee. This was originally set up to hire young, entry level people out of high school or who were getting welfare and get them started in the workforce. You can tell who the companies who abuse and profit off this program are - they are the companies with low entry wages and a high turn-over rate.
But ultimately, tricks and slackers aside, the real problem with getting people to work is that there are only 3 or 4 jobs around minimum wage and perhaps 1 or 2 jobs that are above living wage available for every 10 people looking for work.
With 24 million people vying for the 5 million or so mediocre minimum wage and 2 million or so good, living wage jobs, there's really not that much available - especially for those who are "overqualified".
I know of two/three 40+ year old laid off computer and electrical engineers who applied to but couldn't get the "skilled", better than entry level paying jobs at Target, Radio Shack, Ralphs, or Lowes because "they'd just leave when a better (i.e - that they got their degree in) job will come around". Still on unemployment after being laid off in late 2009/2010. The commercial electricians and building contractor companies don't need to hire an engineer they have to retrain to do installation - and besides, they have enough technically-competent applicants out of ROP or the military that can do the work well to code without the Master's Degree. And with the city, county, state and federal government not hiring because of budget cuts - where will they go for work? Who will hire them after they "retrain" - and what should they retrain for? There are fewer and fewer lateral moves that someone can make without starting completely over - and as one gets older, it's harder and harder to just start over.
How many Program Manager or Project Lead jobs are there available to meet the needs of both laid off experienced Program Manager and Project Leads or experienced lead engineers and managers ready for advancement that are looking for that work?
Why should a 47 year old RN with 15 years nursing experience and a degree - who works in a "corporate" Hospital system have to also work at Target part time to supplement her income enough to pay rent on an old apartment and keep her car running?
Why do we have to put up with a "uniquely American" austere way of life, where if you're not one of the decreasingly fortunate few, you're going to be working until you end up on Medicare in a nursing home in your 70's or 80's?
Haele
|