lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:14 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Default or timely deal? |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-25-11 10:14 AM by lonestarnot
And if you think default, do you intend to pay bankers the increases in interest rates that no doubt will occur?
|
CleanGreenFuture
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Timely deal that will metaphorically ram a baseball bat up our urethras. |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
2. No deal Howie, and no I have no intention of paying interest at 50% or more. |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-25-11 10:19 AM by lonestarnot
|
Andy823
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Looks like we have some tea bagger voters here since I see a vote to default!
We need a deal otherwise things are going to get really bad, fast, and I am sure that the morons who want the country to default are not going to be happy when their rates go up, plus all the other crap that will hit the fan!
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. The poll is not a matter of druthers rather a question of do you think a deal will be made or do you |
|
think one will not be made.
|
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I interpreted the poll as asking what we thought would happen, not what we want to happen.
The teabaggers have invested financially in default, so they will make it happen. They can do that, and nobody can stop them.
|
Morning Dew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Is this prediction or preference? Makes a difference in how one might answer. |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
snappyturtle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
7. I didn't vote because I don't have an inkling of what's going to happen. |
|
I've never before seen a debt ceiling debate get so out of hand. Madness.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. None of us really do. Just wondering what we're thinking about it. Wonder if |
|
wagers are being made in Vegas?
|
Gunny1
(81 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Default because we're not going to get a resonable compromise from Boner or the thugs. |
|
Those of you saying 'deal' - are you prepared to accept huge cuts with no revenues? Because that's all we're going to get from these creeps. Seriously, are you ready for that?
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. The question is not with regard to what anyone is or is not willing to accept. Just a yes or no. |
Gunny1
(81 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
I didn't realize elaboration was verboten in your thread.
In my defense, this is an F-ing discussion board.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Oh for shit sakes, I didn't mean it that way. |
Common Sense Party
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. Lighten up, Francis. n/t |
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
11. It depends on what the "deal" is. |
|
Cuts to benefits, present or future, is unacceptable and unnecessary. And, Obama should be introduced to his veto pen and instructed on it's use.
|
alc
(649 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
There's plenty of revenue to cover debt if a deal isn't reached on time. Other budget items will be cut. Obama will pick items that get the most media attention with blame of the house and repubs will need to make a deal. But neither side is going to budge before some government programs are suspended and people start complaining about lost services or benefits.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Neither. We can raise the limit as we have done before. |
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Just raise the limit. |
|
Right now, it's all about political games. And it stinks.
|
blkmusclmachine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |
18. It's Guaranteed to be a bad deal. |
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. After The Teabaggers Throw Us Into Default… |
|
…they will be able to demand even more.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |