Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Default or timely deal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:14 AM
Original message
Poll question: Default or timely deal?
Edited on Mon Jul-25-11 10:14 AM by lonestarnot
And if you think default, do you intend to pay bankers the increases in interest rates that no doubt will occur?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Timely deal that will metaphorically ram a baseball bat up our urethras.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. No deal Howie, and no I have no intention of paying interest at 50% or more.
Edited on Mon Jul-25-11 10:19 AM by lonestarnot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well
Looks like we have some tea bagger voters here since I see a vote to default!

We need a deal otherwise things are going to get really bad, fast, and I am sure that the morons who want the country to default are not going to be happy when their rates go up, plus all the other crap that will hit the fan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The poll is not a matter of druthers rather a question of do you think a deal will be made or do you
think one will not be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Not At All
I interpreted the poll as asking what we thought would happen, not what we want to happen.

The teabaggers have invested financially in default, so they will make it happen.
They can do that, and nobody can stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is this prediction or preference? Makes a difference in how one might answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Prediction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. I didn't vote because I don't have an inkling of what's going to happen.
I've never before seen a debt ceiling debate get so out of hand. Madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. None of us really do. Just wondering what we're thinking about it. Wonder if
wagers are being made in Vegas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gunny1 Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Default because we're not going to get a resonable compromise from Boner or the thugs.
Those of you saying 'deal' - are you prepared to accept huge cuts with no revenues? Because that's all we're going to get from these creeps. Seriously, are you ready for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The question is not with regard to what anyone is or is not willing to accept. Just a yes or no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gunny1 Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well pardon me!
I didn't realize elaboration was verboten in your thread.

In my defense, this is an F-ing discussion board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh for shit sakes, I didn't mean it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Lighten up, Francis. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. It depends on what the "deal" is.
Cuts to benefits, present or future, is unacceptable and unnecessary. And, Obama should be introduced to his veto pen and instructed on it's use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. neither
There's plenty of revenue to cover debt if a deal isn't reached on time. Other budget items will be cut. Obama will pick items that get the most media attention with blame of the house and repubs will need to make a deal. But neither side is going to budge before some government programs are suspended and people start complaining about lost services or benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. Neither. We can raise the limit as we have done before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. Just raise the limit.
Right now, it's all about political games. And it stinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. It's Guaranteed to be a bad deal.
A very, very bad deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. After The Teabaggers Throw Us Into Default…
…they will be able to demand even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC