Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What options does Obama have with Emergency Powers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:28 AM
Original message
What options does Obama have with Emergency Powers?
Lets say we're down to the last couple days and the House refuses to agree to anything. Does Obama have any "emergency power" leeway? It was suggested in an article I read yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. 14th Amendment
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm talking more like suspending Habeas Corpus type powers.
But I agree on the 14th amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. He could also try an Executive Order... but that would likely be overturned in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. I've wondered what Obama has up his sleeve when he told Cantor, "Don't call my bluff, Eric"
Bill Clinton has called for him to use the 14th Amendment and arbitrarily use executive order to raise the limit, since NOT raising it would be unconstitutional. The next piece of business would be for the Courts to find that the 1917 law mandating a debt ceiling is unconstitutional.

For everyone criticizing Barack Obama and saying they won't vote for him next year, I give you two names:

Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan

Then consider that two of the current liberal members of the Supreme Court, Justices Ginsberg and Breyer are 78 and 72, respectively, and are believed to be ready to retire. Scalia and Kennedy are both 75.

That's all I need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Look at the exchange in this thread about "Joint Res. of Disapproval". Maybe.
Edited on Mon Jul-25-11 10:53 AM by leveymg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let me get this right:
He's going to use emergency powers in a contrived, manufactured emergency?

Does anyone else see the problem with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Is a manufactured emergency is still an emergency?
Just because it is preventable doesn't make it less of a problem. Of course, the congress does have a course of action. If they choose not to take it, it would be extraordinary for a president to act on his own. Would it be legal and what precedent would it set? I hope it doesn't got this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, if it's manufactured, then it's a fake situation cooked up to get us to do something...
Edited on Mon Jul-25-11 11:02 AM by originalpckelly
that we would never do in normal times.

Even when there is a genuine emergency, emergency powers are basically one of the chief ways democracies become dictatorships. That's where the word dictator comes from, an office in the Roman Republic that was filled in times of emergency by an appointee of their Senate for a six month period, and what was done during that time was not later accountable under their system of law.

This whole thing is the reason they turned from a Republic into an Empire.

In this case we have not even a real situation. It's all contrived, just so we will wet our pants and let them pass austerity measures, while letting the rich not even have to bear the slightest bit of additional burden during these supposedly tough times for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I disagree
It's a real situation cooked up to get us to do something. If the limit isn't raised there will be real consequences. I agree that it's contrived and cooked up. But there are consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. he can launch a war without Congressional approval, why not raise the debt ceiling too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC