Godhatesfags now redirects to

[Skip_In_Boulder]

AnonNewsNet Anon News Network
RT @AnonFront: TANGO DOWN! - godhatesfag.com - Now redirects to Gay Chat! HAHAHAH! #ANONYMOUS! @YourAnonNews

Keep up the good work Anon

[dana_b]

1. beautiful....

:D

[joshcryer]

2. I had to check it for myself, fortunately it was safe for my eyes.

Wonderful!

:rofl:

[TDale313]

3. Priceless :)

[Search and Destroy]

4. They got the website wrong. It's Godhatesfags (with an s, and it's still up)

Kind of a fail for anon...

[William769]

5. I can't get it to load.

:shrug:

[Search and Destroy]

6. It's loading fine for me

[William769]

9. Just loaded.

Now I'll spend the next hour screaming at the top of my lungs for even typing in that address.

[Skip_In_Boulder]

10. Apparently they have a DDoS attack going as well.

But it does come up sometimes.

[William769]

11. Just loaded.

Now I'll spend the next hour screaming at the top of my lungs for even typing in that address.

[Skip_In_Boulder]

7. Your right, I had not noticed that n/t

[greyl]

18. Why not edit your slightly misleading OP? nt

[Ruby the Liberal]

8. Fail

http://godhatesfags.com/

Still up and hatemongering.

[gateley]

12. LOVE these people! Wish we could donate to their causes, but

then they'd lose their anonymity. :7 Plus, the overhead is probably nil.

[Search and Destroy]

13. Do you also love them when they're taunting people who have terminal cancer?

Anybody who is actually familiar with anon and their tactics know that there's nothing to celebrate about them. They're sick, and their recent "hacktivism" is just their latest call for attention.

AnonNewsNet Anon News Network
Oh, Hitch. Ungod bless you and your dying, cancerous ass.
3 minutes ago

[gateley]

15. So because there are some cruel assholes I can't appreciate the

good they do?

All or nothing? How Republican. :eyes:

[Search and Destroy]

16. "some cruel assholes" -- That's their official twitter feed.

By your logic, if the official GOP twitter feed taunted Elizabeth Edwards, you shouldn't hold it against them just because there's "some cruel assholes."

Do yourself a favor and actually research some of the shit anon has done before they realized how much attention "hacktivism" gets them. The people who swoon over anon without knowing jack shit about them end up looking like complete fools.

[gateley]

19. Wow - that's a stretch. Your comparison isn't valid - there's

no official Anon, yet you compare it to an official GOP twitter feed? Really? And you think my statement indicates my logic would condone that?
:rofl:

I'm aware of what some of these people have done (and probably continue to do) and it's disgusting and despicable, but I do appreciate the good they do in bringing things out in the open that shouldn't be hidden, and messing with those who would rather keep us down.

Do yourself a favor and actually stop presenting yourself as superior to someone with whom you disagree. I'd say welcome to DU, but I doubt I'll be bothering to read any more of your condescending, judgmental posts.

[Search and Destroy]

20. See, people who use that excuse don't seem to realize the double standard

Whenever they do something despicable, the excuse is "There's no official anon, so they're not responsible." But when they do something you like, it's "Yay for anon! Let's donate to anon! I love me some anon!" You can't have it both ways. Either there's an anon, which should be held responsible for what they do, or there isn't and shouldn't be praised when they do something you like.

Oh and that is -the- twitter feed associated with Anon, so for all intents and purposes, it is their "official" feed.

[Fearless]

14. False! It's godhatesfags.com and it's still working.

[JohnnyRingo]

17. It's still effective.

Since it's obvious many people are confused about the spelling it will redirect those people saearching for right wingery to a site that both infuriates and insults them.

I'm glad variations of the domain send people to such appropriate sites.