Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this the President's Plan to Demolish Social Security?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 10:18 PM
Original message
Is this the President's Plan to Demolish Social Security?
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 10:20 PM by sad sally
He said it again last night: "Keep in mind...In fact, I want to extend the payroll tax cut for working families."

Go back and read what was said in December 2010 before the Bush/Obama/Congress tax deal was struck. The warning was that Republicans wouldn't want this tax extended, as it would be seen an evil tax increase. So, who's the champion pushing for an extension? The President.

The President likes to tout the idea of "average" Americans making $50,000 getting $1,000 more each year. Story is that that $1,000 was completely spent by April 2011 due to higher fuel and food costs.

Who has this "holiday tax" benefited most? Want to guess? For a family making $106,800, the current maximum for the FICA tax, they got $2,136 more. For a family making a million dollars, they get $2,136, and for a family making ten million it's $2,136

By providing this cut in the payroll taxes that fund Social Security, which the President now wants to extend, this deal is leading the nation down a slippery slope that could lead to permanent benefits cuts for the middle class and even more wealth for the rich.

Obama's "payroll tax holiday" may end up sending America's seniors on a permanent unpaid for vacation. This "holiday" is a way to undermine Social Security. Tax breaks can be done in so many ways, so why did the President choose this way - the only source of Social Security's funding - to become what looks like a long-term plan?

The President is planting the seed, and you can bet congress will take the bait that the 2% "holiday tax" can't expire in an election year. Meanwhile, the government debt has increased $120 billion (which hasn't been transferred from the general fund). Add another $120+ and viola, the debt has increased to the point where it can never be repaid.

"Never before in Social Security's 75-year history has it taken any funds from the overall Treasury. It's forbidden by law from adding to the deficit. That's why it has its own trust fund, which currently holds a surplus of $2.6 trillion. That's money the Federal government has borrowed, and which it's morally (and legally) obligated to pay back so we can receive our retirement benefits."

Why hasn't the President explained why this "holiday tax," which is killing the Social Security fund, is the only way to ease the tax burden? Is this the plan to destroy Social Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Is this the plan to destroy Social Security?"
....good question....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indykatie Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah That Must Be It...Obama Wants to Demolish SS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoutherDem Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was wondering when I heard him say that,
Isn't that the one tax which doesn't need to be cut? Isn't that the money which is keeping SS going for a few more years? Wouldn't "taking a holiday" from that tax just leave SS that much closer to running out of money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. $117 Billion added to the deficit in 2011/12; extending another year
is estimated to add $120 Billion. Guess there are those who'd rather have the extra $83 dollars a month now and not worry about how the general fund is going to come up with $117 Billion this year and $120 Billion next year. The plan is suspect to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. You are not the only one
Thinking about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sure there will be plenty of money in the general budget to make up ...
the difference.

:sarcasm:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. That bit stuck in my ear, too.
There is little he won't preemptively promise-away. Excepting, of course, the wars. Gotta have priorities!

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, I think this is what he had in mind all along. No doubt about it. Sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. While I opposed the current tax holiday
and I still oppose an extension of it, I'd rather see it used productively. Instead of giving it out willy-nilly, why not give it to employers who hire the long-term unemployed? One month of not having to pay employer FICA for every month that the new hire has been out of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That is an excellent suggestion - especially w/employers blacklisting unemployed
Plenty of reports in the news that employers are saying unemployed need not apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Obama is a buddy to Pete Peterson.
Just Google Pete Peterson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. I am completely against these tax holidays.
It will weaken our position that social security is sound and bolster the excuse for privatization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Payroll Tax "Holiday" also directly connects Social Security to the deficit.
"To prevent Social Security from losing tax revenue, Congress mandated that revenues be transferred from the general fund to the Social Security trust funds to make up for the tax reduction."

http://taxes.about.com/od/payroll/a/Reduced-Social-Security-Withholding-For-2011.htm


WHY did the Democratic Party leadership go to all the additional trouble and complexity of a Payroll Tax Holiday, funded by transferring cash from the General Fund to the Social Security Fund?
Why not do it the easy way and simply give everybody a check from the General Fund?
Bush The Lesser did it that way.

NOW, when Republicans claim that Social Security adds to the deficit,
they are telling the TRUTH.


Pretty clever, eh?



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1538388



Who will STAND and FIGHT for THIS American Majority?
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Unbelievable. It certainly does look like someone wants to
destroy SS and now that they know we know they were lying when they tried to connect it to the deficit, it looks like they came up with a Machiavellian way to make it true.

Who needs Republicans when we have Democrats like this? And people tried to tell us his choice of people for that Commission was nothing to worry about.

Thanks for your post. It just gets worse the more we learn about all of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. NO. But the REPUBLICANS have said that they want to demolish SS, Medicare, and Medicaid. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC