Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why I Am Against the Death Penalty.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:02 AM
Original message
Why I Am Against the Death Penalty.
Edited on Wed Jul-27-11 07:27 AM by Stuart G
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolando_Cruz_case

A five to ten minute read about a wrongly convicted man who sat on death row for years.
Convicted on a murder he did not commit, and convicted again.
I imagine he was kinda smart ass to the cops and prosecuters.
He was a gang member, well known.
Being a smart ass does not make a person a murderer..they went after him even with some evidence that he was innocent.

So, you suppose this is the only one in this country?

In Texas under Bush there were 125 executions. Bush was quoted as saying all were fair trials.

How many were inncocent?


In Illinois there were 25 on death row..
Half were proven innocent. later.. and released.

As a result of this case, Illinois has abolilshed the death penalty.
How many wrongly convicted people have been executed in this country?
One is too many. And there has been more than one.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am in favor of the death penalty for heinous crimes.
The U.S. system is excellent:

Proof on the prosecution side.
Reasonable doubt on the defense side.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The U.S. system is not excellent. Favors the rich, always.
The poor do not have the same chance as the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. "excellent"????
Edited on Wed Jul-27-11 07:51 AM by AlabamaLibrul
Maybe if the U.S. system actually followed the principles you listed

Reasonable doubt on the rich, white, and lawyered up side
Guilty until proven innocent on the poor, minority, public defender side

You need only look at the story of the lady who left her "profusely sweating" baby in her brand new Mercedes while she went shopping, got released without bail, and kept her kid to see that. The same story on the other side of town in an 88 Honda and the lady would have gotten 25k+ bail, been considered a "flight risk", and never seen the light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. how does your opinion comport with the facts presented in the op?
Edited on Wed Jul-27-11 01:42 PM by frylock
people have been wrongly accused and murdered by the state for "heinous crimes." in what world would that perceived as excellent?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
Without exception,I`m against the death penalty. First, it`s an obscene amount of power to give to the state and a cursory scan of the numerous successes of The Innocence Project...and others... is my reason #2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R..
I do not believe the death penalty is what civilized societies do. I do not want the state to commit "legalized" murder in my name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R n/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not me..
You knowingly and with malice unlawfully take the life of another you should forfeit your own...no excuses, no coddling of murderers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. how about the wrongly accused?
fuck them too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. If you want to learn a bit about Texas justice...
John Grisham's non fiction 'The Innocent Man' will fill you in. His most important work. Not fiction, I repeat because of the author's reputation for making a good story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. personally i don't give a crap if we knew with 100% certainty they were all guilty as hell
NO GOVERNMENT should EVER be allowed to claim the right to kill its subjects.

history has shown that this is a terrible idea. nevermind the problems when it's working as its proponents say it's supposed to, it's subject to abuse and over time can lead to horrendous results as more and more crimes, eventually including political ones, are deemed capital crimes.

it's just NOT something any government should be in the business of doing.
lock 'em up and throw away the key. whatever benefit you get from killing them instead of locking them up forever PALES in comparison to the monster that is unleashed if you grant your government the right to kill its subjects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Agreed
But I also have a problem with the state having authority over life and death situations

I'm anti war too

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. You can't take it back, and we all know that
innocent people are convicted sometimes. There are some instances, such as with Tim McVeigh or Ted Bundy, in which all doubt of guilt is removed, but those cases are far from ordinary. If we're going to have a consistent policy on how we deal with the worst criminals, then life in prison should be the worst punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Capital punishment is not about justice.
It says it, right there in the bold face type. As a society, we like to punish. Punishment, retribution, vengeance. These have little to do with justice.

A society that executes people teaches its citizens that murder is a crime, except when it's carried out by the state.

I don't like having that kind of blood on my hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Death Penalty is barbaric and serves no purpose
as far as justice is concerned. It DOES cater to the lowest instincts of human nature, eg, some people's need for revenge.

We are the only 'civilized' country in the world that still uses the death penalty. It's always strange to see Americans express outrage over brutal dictatorships' use of the death penalty and attempting to intervene on behalf of victims of it in countries like Saudi Arabia eg. I guess they don't know how other countries view this country each time the state executes someone.

I hope one day we will evolve into a more civilized society. Support for the death penalty is diminishing since the 'law and order' days of thee Reagan administration. The sooner we stop state sponsored killing the better. It's funny too to talk to 'pro-life' Republicans all of whome support the death penalty and war who don't make the connection between supporting 'death' while clainming to be 'pro-life'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Recommended.
I have a friend who served 20 years for a crime he did not commit. When he was tried, the state of NJ sought the death penalty for Rubin and his equally innocent co-defendant. They narrowly escaped dying for a crime that they did not commit.

More, although there are always cases where I find myself horrified and outraged, I oppose the death penalty even in these cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC