Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beauty ads banned because of too damn much air brushing. gawd forbid someone has wrinkles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:20 PM
Original message
Beauty ads banned because of too damn much air brushing. gawd forbid someone has wrinkles
Because Julia Roberts wasn't beautiful enough: Star among celebs whose ads were banned over airbrushing

By Sean Poulter

They were hired for their beauty. But it seems that Julia Roberts and Christy Turlington weren’t quite beautiful enough for L’Oreal.

Pictures of them were digitally altered to make their skin appear even more flawless in advertisements for the beauty firm.

Both ads have been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority after complaints that they were misleading.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2019162/Julia-Roberts-Christy-Turlington-L-Oreal-adverts-banned-airbrushing.html#ixzz1TKaNLp00







Too good to be true: This Maybelline advert starring Christy Turlington was one of the adverts banned over its use of the airbrush





Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2019162/Julia-Roberts-Christy-Turlington-L-Oreal-adverts-banned-airbrushing.html#ixzz1TKaIJZPz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a surprise? It's been happening for decades,
long before digital retouching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Not a surprise. Yes it's been done, but it's more extreme these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think they both look better before air brushing. The air brushed picts
don't look real. They look more like what a rubber dolls than people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. "rubber dolls" Yes! That's it!
That's exactly what all the magazine people look like!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, Noticed they both have the same nose and lips. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Same doctor probably.
Sad that they both have such awful trout pout. If they are going to photoshop you anyway, why destroy your looks with the knife and collagen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let me say up-front that I believe both these women are beautiful even without airbrushing
but I consider touch-up work in the advertisement of beauty products to be dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Advertizing is all about convoluting the truth. Call it lies if you
want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Um, yeah. It's lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. With all the photoshopping they do in this kind of advertising...
... they might as well use a computer model.

Someone like Christy Turlington or Julia Roberts wouldn't even have to show up to have their pictures taken. The advertising company could simply download their digital models and render the image anyway they pleased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morizovich Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kicked and Recommended
Cookie-cutter women do not interest me. I'll take Katie Segal over Christina Applegate anytime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phentex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. I love the ones who use 20 somethings to sell wrinkle cream...
or face wash and claim everyone can have that skin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. lol. They edited out everything on Julie's face that made it interesting.
Her nose bridge bump and slightly off center nose and chin dimples and her extra-long ear lobes are also gone.

I suppose they'd also alter her nature, explosive guffaw laughter to a girlish, acceptable twitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC