Raven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-27-11 03:03 PM
Original message |
These CBO people must be made of iron. |
|
I know very little about this group but they must be under tremendous pressure not only because their analyses often go against the powers-that-be but also because they seem to be under inhuman time pressures. Can anyone fill me in on who these folks are?
|
cally
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-27-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Some of them went to Graduate Public Policy schools |
|
and you are trained on a way of thinking about politics and pressure. You also maintain a peer group that reinforces the need for non-partisan analysis to maintain a functioning government.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-27-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
No wonder the RW hates teachers.
|
kirby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-27-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Kinda like the poor Clerk of the Court who has to read the full text of bills when the parties get in a pissing match.
The CBO has to constantly update their spreadsheets/financial models while I'm sure holier than thou Congress staffers complain why is it taking so long.
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-27-11 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Most of them come from academia. |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-27-11 03:21 PM by MilesColtrane
The CBO has a history of nonpartisanship that may partially be the result of a constantly shifting majority in Congress.
I think most sane Senators and Reps really want accurate, unbiased figures out of the CBO. They can always spin the results later, as needed.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-27-11 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
5. And the CBO came out and said the Obama's Health Care Plan would be cost effective. How long |
|
until the GOP base starts attacking the CBO for it science?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message |