LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:48 PM
Original message |
What happens once the Fourteenth Amendment is invoked? |
|
I'm a bit lost on the non-political consequences and what would follow procedurally.
|
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Obama would then pay the bills that are due. |
|
Each month 70 million checks are sent out, so all the checks would be able to be paid.
|
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm not sure there is a "procedure...." |
|
The "debt ceiling" would simply become an unconstitutional fiction. Which is what it probably is anyway, since the money party doesn't REALLY want the debtors-- us-- let off the hook for their continued profits that easily.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They would move to impeach him. |
|
It's a rock and hard place situation. I hope he does and has the fortitude to fight impeachment like Bill Clinton did, but I wonder if he has the stomach for it.
|
Cool Logic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. It is regrettable to say, but if the President endeavored to usurp Congressional jurisdiction |
|
from the Congress, it stands to reason that he would face impeachment.
|
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. Invoking the U.S. Constitution is NOT a 'criminal offensive' |
|
'To impeach' means to bring forth 'criminal charges'.
In order to impeach there must be a CRIMINAL CHARGE.
If President Obama uses what is written in the U.S. Constitution it is NOT criminal.
I wonder how many times I'm going to have to point that out here in DU ;(
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. Actually, it's not me saying this. I heard it discussed |
|
on Thom Hartmann this morning and the consensus was that the Republicans would impeach him. I agree, using the Constitution is not criminal but neither is getting blow jobs in the Oval Office, yet Clinton was impeached. And, Clinton himself said he would invoke the 14th amendment and then fight them in court, so even he thinks the Repugs will do everything they can do to unseat this President.
|
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Clinton was impeached due to 'lying under oath', which IS a criminal offense. |
|
When/IF President Obama were to invoke the 14th amendment it would NOT be a criminal offense.
Until someone comes up with what the 'criminal charge' would be, then all the folks that are talking about impeachment are just blowing smoke without any legal basis for their prediction.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. Technically, yes, but Starr had to follow a trail of |
|
bimbo incidents to trap him into lying and he himself realized it was a witch hunt and decided to fight it. He wasn't found guilty.
|
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Obama will pay the bills, the GOP will go to TSCOTUS |
|
and TSCOTUS will either vote with Wall Street or against Obama..
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Ha! You got that right! nt |
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. The GOP would NOT have 'legal standing' so NO they couldn't go to the SCOTUS. n/t |
mdmc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
TSCOTUS can find them some legal standing I am sure..
|
Kingofalldems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
5. And the freepers/teabaggers will go wild |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Says he's not going to, but I don't know what he would be |
|
able to do if there's NOTHING to sign at 11:59pm on August 1st.
|
roamer65
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
8. A Constitutional crisis, mainly fabricated by the Rethugs. |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 05:58 PM by roamer65
They'll go for articles of impeachment, but there are not enough votes in the Senate to remove Obama from office.
|
Cool Logic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. A Constitutional crisis, in accordance with the Constitution. |
DrinkBeerNotTea
(44 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Wouldn't it be unconstitutional to NOT invoke the 14th Amendment? |
|
Failing to invoke it and allowing default is unconstitutional.
|
dmosh42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
20. Reading that part of the amendment only seems to say that whatever was appropriated... |
|
is 'the debt' and needs to be paid for. Where the debt ceiling comes in, has never been spelled out.
|
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I don't know about after, but before.... |
|
He'll would have to freeze over
|
PuffedMica
(584 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Invoking the Fourteenth Amendment forces the Judaical Branch to become involved |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 07:46 PM by PuffedMica
If it not apparent by now, we are getting no where with only the Congressional Branch and the Executive Branch trying to make a deal. Throw in the Judicial Branch, and the Government will slip away into the misty swamp of anarchy.
|
Major Hogwash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
21. And then we all have to start going to church and pray the Supremes aren't stoopid. |
|
If they turn it down, then it's time to storm the corporate gates.
|
brooklynite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 08:25 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Let's be clear: the 14th Amendment is not about SPENDING... |
|
...it's about BORROWING. The US Government can't spend money that it doesn't have. Today it spends more than it takes in, so it borrows money to pay the current bills. Invoking the 14th Amendment means than, in orderr to meet the current debt obligations of the US, the Administration would BORROW additional funds (becoming FUTURE obligations) irrespective of the Statutory Debt Limit.
|
LibertyLover
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-29-11 08:32 AM
Response to Original message |
23. I don't believe there actually is a procedure |
|
because if I understand it correctly, that portion of the 14th Amendment has never actually been invoked in a situation like the one we find ourselves in. There is a dispute among Constitutional scholars as to whether it even could be invoked by President Obama as a means to prevent a governmental default. Since I'm not anything approaching an expert on the Constitution, my personal view is "what the hell, go for it and piss off the Republicans", but I am fully aware that might not be the best solution. The only thing I'm sure of is that if President Obama chooses to invoke the 14th Amendment and prevent a default, the ink won't be dry on the impeachment paperwork before he is served.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message |