Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds stonewall on cell phone tracking of Americans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 08:43 PM
Original message
Feds stonewall on cell phone tracking of Americans
In a letter to two Senators, the Obama administration has refused to publicly disclose the extent of government tracking of American citizens—or even to describe the legal basis on which it is conducting such tracking. "We will get back to you," the letter says.

Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Mark Udall (D-CO) have emerged in recent months as the Senate's leading critics of unfettered government surveillance. In mid-July, they sent a letter to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper seeking information about whether the federal government had "the authority to collect the geolocation information of American citizens for intelligence purposes." They also asked about the number of Americans whose communications have been intercepted (FISA warrants are only supposed to target non-Americans) and details on rumored incidents of intelligence officials failing to comply with the law.

In a Tuesday letter, Clapper aide Kathleen Turner politely brushed aside all of these questions. She refused to publicly divulge any details about the nature, extent, or legal basis of the government's domestic spying activities. Instead, she directed Wyden and Udall to classified materials the administration had already made available to members of Congress, and offered to discuss the Senators' concerns in greater detail in a classified briefing.

Turner claimed that it was "not reasonably possible to identify the number of people located in the United States whose communications may have been reviewed" under the FISA Amendments Act, though she noted that statistics about the number of "disseminated intelligence reports" containing information about Americans was available in classified materials. Similarly, she argued that she couldn't provide any details about "compliance incidents" without compromising confidential sources and methods.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/07/feds-stonewall-on-cell-phone-tracking-of-americans.ars


insanity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. .



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Boffo. Reminds me of the snaps of Adlai Stevenson at the UN.
Not even the gravitas of this off-the0cuff photo of John Foster, Adlai and dear Eleanor.

I don't think she would much like Barack these days. I know he wouldn't like the things she would have to say about any President who threatened to trade away Social Security to balance the budget. She wouldn't be speaking to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. They aren't tapping your phones
They're reviewing your communications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Gentlemen don't read each others' email.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC