Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:20 PM
Original message |
There really is only ONE conclusion. If restaurants are forced to allow children |
|
it will ONLY lead to the logical conclusion that people will start marrying their animals.
There are no other options. Sadly. We are screwn!
|
Selatius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I dunno what all the fuss was about. I wasn't allowed to eat out until I was about 7. |
|
By then, my mom had placed into me some sense of civility when out in public. If a restaurant wants to impose a child/toddler ban, that's their right to do so, but it's the right of patrons to or eat there or not eat there as a consequence.
|
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Then pet "cohabitants" get to claim a tax deduction? |
ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The organism I married is an animal. nt |
Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message |
4. if they don't want kids they should have topless waitresses |
Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Or bottomless waiters. |
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
5. if children are outlawed then only outlaws will have children |
larwdem
(203 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-11 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message |